Home » Misc » Stories on time

Stories on time


Moral stories about time

Story About Sense Of Time

Once an old man and a young man were sitting on the shore of a wild and stormy river.

“Master,” the student asked, “why does the time flow straight, but always ripples, either slowing down to a complete stop, or racing like a cow with a thistle under her tail?”

The teacher looked at the seething water and answered:

“You see there are a few large stones in the river and a lot of small pebbles. Imagine that the river is your life. If you will only rejoice over big occasions – like your wedding that will happen next month, or like a new baby that you will have after one year, or new business that you will start after five years…  – then you will cross your life in a few jumps, like jumping from one stone to another. Otherwise, if you will move in small paces over the pebbles, taking joy in small things: a sunny day, the beauty of autumn forest, a good conversation, then later looking back at your life you won’t see ten big stones, but lots of your own traces, and each of them you will be able to remember with a happy smile. And you will see that the road that you have crossed is much longer.”

“But teacher, when I love or when I do the work that I like or when I have a talk with friends – the time flies fast. But the time drags so long when I’m hurt, when I’m afraid or when I feel lonely.”

“You see,” the old man answered wistfully, “this is what it should be. When we are unhappy, we don’t live but we only exist, so the time lies still in our wallets. And only for our happiness we pay the ringing coin of time, that we still have left.”

Stories about time

One day a wise man was asked a question: “What is time?”

His answer was:

– Yesterday, today, tomorrow…

The one who asked the question was disappointed:

– That’s it?

– Well, – the wise man said, – then listen to this story.

 

There was Today which wanted to become Always…  Yesterday said:

– I also wanted to become Always when I was you…

– Did you ask Always how it does that? – inquired Today.

– I asked.

– And?

– By changing, – was its answer, – by becoming Tomorrow from Today.

– But that means, – Today thought, – that Always does not belong to itself. It is always someone else! It means that something is making it do that. But what is it?

Yesterday said:

– Maybe it’s Time?

– What is time? – Today asked. – It’s only you and me, and also Tomorrow…

 

The one who was asking the wise man said nothing more, because another person, who was silent before, joined their conversation:

– But wise man, it means that time is the thing what passes. And that is wrong. It can also last by stopping.

The wise man looked at him with curiosity and answered with a smile:

– You are right. Sometimes today can last hundreds and thousands of years… before it passes. Sometimes it feels like yesterday has come back and we are living in it. There is a little bit of tomorrow in yesterday and in today, but we rarely recognise it. It turns out that there is only this trinity.

Importance of Time Management Through Stories

Since childhood, we have heard the famous phrase “time is money”. However, most of us do not understand its real value and thus, we are unable to achieve our goals in life. RevampMind is always a step ahead to help people maintain their living standards and manage life situations effortlessly. So, here, we talk about the importance of time management through a few short stories.

Hopefully, these moral stories in English would change your mindset & motivate you to adopt an ideal routine in your life to balance your personal and professional work together.

Yesterday is history.
Tomorrow is a mystery.
Today is a gift.
That’s why it’s called the present!

Sometimes, when we are sitting idle, we think we have a lot of time. On the other hand, when we have several tasks to do, it seems, time is running.

But why does this happen?

It is a fact that every day, we get only 24 hours, which is common for everyone. But still, why do we sometimes say, time is flying?

Worry not!

Because, once you will understand the value of time, and how to manage it, you can utilize every minute of your precious life without wasting it in vain.

So let’s understand the importance of time management through some motivational and inspirational time management stories.

Get 42 Points Self-Improvement Free PDF Checklist

Tired of living with constant stress and anxiety? Do you want to change your life but don't know HOW? 

Our PDF checklist talks about 42 points that would help you to be happy and live the life you want.

A Jar And Props – A Popular Short Story On Time Management

There was a professor at a university who thought of giving a lesson to his students about time management skills and managing it appropriately.

He brought a jar, sand, rocks, water, and some pebbles to the class and kept them on a table. The professor chose a student and asked him to fill the jar with all the props.

The volunteer student started with water and then sand and then pebbles. And finally, he found that there is no space to put all the rocks inside.

Likewise, the professor asked other students as well to perform the task and everyone tried to fill it with all the props but unfortunately didn’t succeed.

Finally, the professor started to fill the jar with rocks, then he added the pebbles, and further he added the sand. Still, there was some space to pour the water and the professor did so.

Moral Of The Story On Time Management

In this story, your life situation has been compared with these props,

Water, sands, and pebbles are to be compared with the tasks/goals which we are more focused to do on priority. For example, we kill our time watching television, surfing Social Media Sites, roaming around with bad companies, and all.

Whereas, the rocks are the biggest goal or task that we used to finish on the least priority.

If you are filling the jar of your life with chunks, there won’t be any space to fill it with the most important things. But doing vice-versa is possible and you can achieve everything in a managed way.

Day With A Limited Credit

Just imagine that your father gives you Rs. 86,400 every day in the morning and gives you the freedom to spend it on anything. But the bet is, the amount will not be carried forward to the next day and will expire the same day.

In such a winning situation, you will probably plan to spend the amount on buying your most desired fashion accessories, study materials, hanging out with friends, and so on. Still, if you are left with some remaining amount that is going to expire soon but you were unable to utilize that. Then despite regret, you can’t do anything.

Moral Of This Short Story On the Importance Of Time Management

The same thing happens with our precious life where each day, we are fortunate with 24 hours, i. e. 86,400 seconds. It is a person’s choice to utilize it for the good or to waste it.

Imagine the below situation to realize the value of time in a better way.

  • 1 year: A student who failed a class.
  • 1 Month: A mother who delivered a premature baby.
  • 1 Week: A weekly newspaper editor who collected the updates.
  • 1 Hour: The lovers who are eagerly waiting to meet their soulmate.
  • 1 Minute: A person who missed a train.
  • 1 Second: A person who met with an accident.

To keep you motivated, Revamp Mind love publishing unique ideas to fight the difficulties of life. You can read a few other trending articles here.

5 Powerful Women Roles In Ott
Lessons To Learn From ‘The Monk Who Sold His Ferrari’ – Inspirational Story
Work From Home Job Options During The Lockdown
Toxic Relationship: Don’t Ignore These 7 Warning Signs

5 Years of a King

There was a kingdom with a strict rule that every king will serve for 5 years only. Post his rule, he was required to go to the forest to spend the rest of his life. But the strange thing was; that woodland was full of dangerous animals and nothing was available to live a good life. So there won’t be any chance to come back alive.

Many kings came to serve in that kingdom and followed the rule as prescribed.

Once, the people of the kingdom decided to choose the desired person as their next king who was very wise. They tried to convince the person to become their next king but he denied it after knowing the rule. But somehow, he agreed to become the next king with a condition.

He asked the people to let him visit that place where every king had gone after giving their services. He found that the place is full of trees and dangerous animals. There were no facilities for survival.

After the inspection, he came back to the kingdom and became the king.

Now, he started to plan for making the forest a peaceful place where survival is possible.

In the first year, he started with the planning and execution of cutting some trees to make a proper path to go inside the forest.

In the second year, he started with the plan to shift the dangerous animals to the safest place apart from that woodland. Further, in the third year onwards, he worked hard to start farming and making some small houses around.

Finally, that forest was enough to live a peaceful life without any problems.

Moral Of This Time Management Short Story

In those 5 years, the king utilized the time properly with the best strategy. In this way, he followed all the rules and in time, he managed to create a way to spend a better life.

This time management story is inspirational for those who are hunting in the present to get a better lifestyle for the future. If we design a plan with time management skills, then definitely, nobody can stop us from achieving success in life.

Best Articles For You
Top 5 Money-Saving Tips For Better Financial Planning & Analysis
Why Is Life Insurance Needed In 2021?

Warren Buffett And An Interview Anchor

In an interview, an anchor asked Warren Buffett (One of the richest men in the world), how he utilize the opportunities of life.

To give a practical idea, Warren Buffett offered a blank cheque and asked her to fill in the desired amount. At the moment, she considered this offer a joke and lost the opportunity to become rich person.

Then Buffett said, you just lost a huge opportunity. In my entire life, I have never missed any opportunities, small or big and that is the reason behind my achievements.

Moral Of This Story On the Importance Of Time Management

If the anchor wouldn’t take the opportunity for granted at that moment, she could have earned a huge amount that was enough to maintain a luxurious life.

In real life, we also get several opportunities and due to fear of family, society, comfort zone, hesitation, etc. we lose them and regret them afterward.

Instead of that, we should live in the present and try to find ways to use as many credits of life as we can.

Final Thoughts

Hope the above Short Stories on time management will help you manage your life in a better way. You can also read other motivational stories at RevampMind like Why I Hate Social Media?, Mantra For A Better Growth & Success, and several other Inspirational stories to manage your time.

Post Views: 3,336

Lessons in calligraphy history. The main thing is to stop in time in an effort to master the past / Ideas and people / Nezavisimaya Gazeta

The painful attitude of some modern politicians to the December uprising of 1825 can be explained by their doubts about the stability of the Russian state they built. Vasily Timm. Life Guards Horse Regiment during the uprising on December 14, 1825 on St. Isaac's Square. 1853. Hermitage

Historical events cannot be forgotten or rewritten forever. Figuratively speaking, they are dormant and grow through the fabric of today's life when certain conditions arise. Knowledge and awareness of the historical phenomena of the past captures the minds of politicians, historians and ordinary citizens and encourages them to think about the future.

History rewriting history

Rewriting history is not a new occupation; it was done in antiquity, in the Middle Ages, and in modern, and in recent history. This was done by the Roman emperors, and Ivan the Terrible, and Catherine II, and Stalin, and many others. Empires and states collapsed, new dynasties and rulers replaced the old ones, who had the need to correct history in accordance with their own needs and ideas about what a great past should be like or how insignificant and insidious their opponents were. The rewriting of history with the advent of Christianity acquired a religious connotation, and with the advent of ideology at the end of the 18th century and its development in the 19th–20th centuries, it acquired an ideological one. However, it has always had a strong personal imprint. Today, history, approved and accepted at the official level, is a kind of litmus test, showing an ideology lowered from above.

Interestingly, the methods of rewriting history have hardly changed - falsification of facts by replacing some events with others, erasing significant phenomena and characters, but most importantly - a new interpretation of well-known historical events. Only the technique has changed. Emperor Caracalla, seeking to get rid of his rival, not only killed his brother Geta, but also gave the order to erase his image from the facade of the arch near the Bull Market in Rome, and Joseph Stalin, who executed and sent disgraced party leaders and military leaders to camps, erased their names from textbooks and books in a typographical way.

An example of a skillful rewriting of history was remarkably described by the Russian publicist and literary critic Nikolai Dobrolyubov, having analyzed the work of Catherine II “Notes on Russian History”: “In general, in the Notes on Russian History, the Empress, giving us an example of her views on history, at the same time presented the ability to carry one's thought through the entire work and direct it towards the confirmation of one's idea, without resorting to either obvious exaggerations or a complete distortion of reliable facts. Sometimes she gave them her own meaning, kept silent about one thing and changed the tone of the story about another; but the art of storytelling was such that it did not even occur to the reader that there could be anything other than what was being communicated to him.

Probably, the witty thesis about the unpredictability of the past applies not only to Russia, but in relation to recent Russian history, it acquires special significance due to the tragic nature of its development, which resulted in the dichotomy of the historical consciousness of post-Soviet Russia.

Who are we?

After the Soviet Union ceased to exist, one of the main questions was the dilemma: who is post-Soviet Russia - the successor and successor of the USSR or the Russian Empire? Initially, the Solomonic solution to this problem in the ongoing discussion between historians and lawyers about the national-state succession of the new Russia was found in a simplified definition of the Russian Federation as the successor of the USSR and as the legal successor of the Russian Empire. Legally, the answer to this question was spelled out in the diplomatic formulation of the resolution of the State Duma of the Russian Federation dated 10/23/98: "The Russian state (Rus), the Russian Republic, the RSFSR, the USSR, the Russian Federation are one and the same participant in interstate relations, one and the same subject of international law that does not cease to exist. " This formulation is as true as it is meaningless for understanding the nature of post-Soviet Russia. As the Soviet and Russian historian Sergei Volkov rightly noted, “for a resident of the country itself, in order to understand the essence of the state regime existing in it, it is important not who other countries consider it to be, but who this regime considers itself to be.” This remains the biggest mystery to this day.

The finalized federal law on compatriots of 2010, which states that “the Russian Federation is the legal successor and successor of the Russian state, the Russian Republic, the RSFSR and the USSR”, only formally indicates the historical continuity of today's Russia, since it is impossible to find greater antipodes than historical pre-revolutionary Russia and the Soviet Union created on its ashes. The amendment made to the Constitution in 2020 also cannot reconcile the irreconcilable, but raises even more questions: “The Russian Federation, united by a thousand-year history, preserving the memory of the ancestors who passed on to us the ideals and faith in God, as well as the continuity in the development of the Russian state, recognizes historically established state unity. However, our different ancestors also passed on different ideals to us: “commissars in dusty helmets” are one, and “junker gentlemen” are others. If we talk about faith in God, then it simply did not exist in the Soviet Union, the country of scientific atheism. So who will inherit today's Russia - pre-revolutionary Russia, Russia of Ivan the Terrible, the Russian Empire of the times of Alexander II, etc.? And which Soviet Union - Stalin's, Brezhnev's, Gorbachev's? Perhaps nothing sheds more light on this existential question than the attitude to the history of power itself.

What is good and what is bad?

The latent existing dichotomy of the Russian society of today's Russia, as in a mirror, is reflected in the interpretation and evaluation of historical events from Ancient Rus' to the present day. The place is still the most relevant and unchanged in its importance and interpretation of the topic is the victory and patriotism of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War. It is impossible not to admire the selflessness and resilience of the Soviet people, exhausted by collectivization, starvation rations and Stalinist repressions, who fought against Nazi Germany for their Fatherland. By analogy, the idea of ​​patriotism is also the main one in relation to the current Russian leadership towards the Patriotic War of 1812. Napoleonic doctor Barry O'Meara noted in his memoirs that Bonaparte was struck by the desperate resistance and patriotism of the common people, who were, in fact, in slavery, but fought for their homeland.

In order to combat the distortion of history, the Investigative Committee (IC) of the Russian Federation decided in September 2020 to create a unit to investigate crimes related to the falsification of the history of the Fatherland and the rehabilitation of Nazism. It should be noted that the fight against the falsification of history has been waged since time immemorial. In ancient Greece, Herodotus, called by Cicero the "father of history", became the creator of the first great historical encyclopedia of the ancient world - "History of the Greco-Persian Wars" and was a fighter against the mythologization of history. In 1440, the Italian humanist and philologist Lorenzo Valla exposed, through philological analysis, the forgery (now they would say fake) of the so-called Constantine gift, which served as a justification for the Catholic Church's claims to supremacy over secular power. Similarly, the Russian historian Nikolai Karamzin questioned the authenticity of Slinger's book about the supposed heretic Martin. This work has been used since the time of Peter I to fight the Old Believers.

The creation of a special structure in the NC inevitably raises the question of whether scientific discussion on historical topics will continue to be possible, that is, whether historical science itself will be preserved. For example, the existence of a secret protocol to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact of August 23, 1939 (on the division of Europe into spheres of influence between the USSR and Germany) was always indignantly denied in the Soviet Union, and its publication in the West was declared a fake (about which dissertations were written in the USSR ). December 1989 years the existence of a secret protocol was recognized in the USSR, he was officially condemned in a resolution of the Congress of People's Deputies. In 1992, the original protocol was found in Russian archives, and in 2019 it was published. However, his assessment today reveals diametrically opposed points of view.

There is a version of Russian historians, supported at the official level, in particular by the Russian Foreign Ministry and the State Duma, that the Non-Aggression Treaty for Moscow was a forced step that gave the Soviet Union almost two years of respite and a territorial buffer to prepare for war and repel aggression. But there is another assessment of this treaty: the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact was a strategic mistake and a practical crime of the Stalinist leadership. He provided Hitler with a secure rear and supplies of Soviet raw materials for the capture of the rest of Europe, an accelerated buildup of military power and obtaining the support of the population of the Baltics, Western Ukraine and Belarus for a lightning throw to Moscow in four months after June 22, 1941 years old.

There is also a third point of view: the signing of the secret protocol, like other similar agreements, is not a crime in itself. The crime is not the secret protocol itself, but its consequences: the mediocre Finnish campaign, failures in preparations for a big war, the destruction of the army command, repressions against the population of new territories. Can, and most importantly, should the state interfere in the professional discussion of historians? Moreover, the current top Russian leadership at different times assessed both the treaty and its consequences in different ways. And if so, then to the two eternal Russian questions “Who is to blame?” and "What to do?" a third is added: “And who are the judges?”

There are also more complex, ideologically sensitive issues for the authorities related to the attitude towards protest movements, rebellions and revolutions in the history of Russia and other states. In principle, any government does not favor protest movements, whether they are French "yellow vests" or American fans of George Floyd. Undoubtedly, evolution, which sets the vector of progressive development for society, is better than a revolution, which is rarely bloodless, not to mention the "Russian rebellion, senseless and merciless." But evolution is unthinkable without feedback between the government and society. The revolutions of the past have clearly shown that power divorced from the real needs of society itself gave rise to revolutionary movements. It seemed to her - "give me a finger, and they will bite off your hand," but it ended in the death of the whole body. This happened in different historical periods both in Russia and in other countries.

Pre-revolutionary historians assessed the Decembrist uprising on December 14, 1825 as a military rebellion against the legitimate government, an apex coup of liberal officers who picked up revolutionary ideas abroad. Meanwhile, it must be recognized that the ideas and goals of the Decembrists were necessary for the normal development of the Russian Empire - the introduction of a constitutional monarchy and the abolition of serfdom. Had Alexander I dared to do this, and there would have been no Decembrist uprising, revolution of 1905, October 1917 years and more. Parliament would take over the functions of providing feedback between the monarch and society and limiting the uncontrolled autocracy, which eventually brought the Bolsheviks to power.

Soviet historiography especially singled out the progressive role of the Decembrists. In accordance with the Bolshevik ideology, the class limitations of the Decembrists did not allow them to complete their plans, but nevertheless they "woke up Herzen." In the later Soviet period of our history, the remarkable historian and writer Nathan Eidelman justifiably considered the Decembrist uprising an attempt to modernize Russia from above. The moral strength of the Decembrists was also sung by writers of the sixties, in particular by Bulat Okudzhava in The Throat of Freedom. Today, the Decembrists are given different assessments: from Dugin's - "bastards, demons and Satanists" to accusations of mediocrity and helplessness, which are imbued with modern printed and cinematographic products intended for the "correct" education of the masses. Vladimir Medinsky, in a radio program about “Myths about Russia”, drew a parallel between the Decembrist uprising and today: “Imagine, the inauguration of the president, rebel tanks are coming to Red Square.” In this comparison, what is striking, first of all, is that the modern political elite of Russia continues to project onto itself the events of 200 years ago. This is unthinkable in either France or Great Britain, both of which have survived their bloody revolutions, although today their leaders face a variety of protest movements. Such a painful attitude of some modern Russian politicians to the December uprising of 1825 can be explained by only one thing - their doubts about the stability of the Russian state they built.

With revolutions in Russia it is even more difficult. If, from the standpoint of today's political pragmatism of the Russian elite, the February bourgeois-democratic revolution of 1917 can not be taken seriously due to its transience and retrospectively declared doom, then with October 1917 the situation is more complicated. How can today's authorities politically correctly evaluate a large-scale historical phenomenon that killed the Russian Empire, the successor of which post-Soviet Russia proclaims itself, if the same revolution gave birth to another of its predecessors - the global Soviet empire?

How to interpret the distortion of history in relation to the leaders of the revolution - Trotsky, Bukharin, Kamenev, Zinoviev and others? At first they are Lenin's "faithful comrades-in-arms". Then - "evil enemies" of the Soviet government, "spies and mercenaries of world imperialism." Then - the "innocent victims" of the Stalinist regime, who betrayed Lenin's precepts. Later - "accomplices in the criminal coup", who suffered the legal punishment of fate for their crimes. And subsequently they were generally forgotten on the principle of "remember for clarity." I wonder who they will officially be tomorrow if they are remembered?

It is even more difficult to assess the personality of the leader of the world proletariat who started this mess. The figure of Lenin turns out to be extremely inconvenient for today's authorities - he came from Germany, in a special carriage, to seize power, nothing more than the intervention of "Western Russophobes." In the Soviet school, every student knew the biography of the “great Lenin”, from childhood, when he “ran along the icy hill”, to his solemnly sad end in Gorki. Everyone remembered the words of young Volodya, spoken after the execution of Sasha's brother: "We will go the other way." Everyone knew about his kindness and love for children, walkers, hares, etc. Of course, the mythologization of Lenin's personality in Soviet historiography and art has little in common with the real appearance and role of this man, who caused catastrophic upheavals in Russia and the world. But if Soviet schoolchildren, having a heavily sugared image of the leader before their eyes, still knew who he was, then modern children simply do not know who Lenin was, that is, they do not know an important part of their history.

It’s easier with Stalin, since it was he who recreated the Russian kingdom of Ivan the Terrible in the new modern guise of the Soviet empire, with his gathering of lands with fire and sword, oprichny terror, obsession with personal security, the most severe oppression of the peasantry and other sectors of society (“servants of their own freedom to favor and execute”) . According to the Levada Center (recognized as a foreign agent in the Russian Federation), the role of Stalin in the life of the country is positively assessed today by a total of 70% of Russians. The popularization of Stalin as a strong leader is achieved by the almost complete exclusion of the topic of political repression from school education and the glorification of Stalin the victor, who built the most powerful military empire with its subsequent victories - the first satellite, Gagarin's space flight and much more, which inspires pride for the country. And here another question, uncomfortable for the authorities, arises: what to do with the revolution (or counter-revolution) 1991 years old? On the one hand, this historic event was the point in the final collapse of the Soviet Union, which, according to a well-known saying, became "the biggest geopolitical catastrophe of the century. " On the other hand, that revolution, the Yeltsin state and the Constitution brought to power today's ruling elite, which is cast a shadow of a curse on August 1991. So far, this historical paradox remains unresolved.

To Caesar what is Caesar's, what is God's to God, but history to historians

Vladimir Putin, during the last press conference on December 17, 2020, admitted that “there were many tragic, black pages in our history.” There are tragic, black pages in the history of any state. However, the most important condition for ensuring that the gloomy events of the past will not be repeated in the future is the knowledge of these pages, and not rewriting them cleanly. That is why interest in history and historical education should begin at school and continue throughout the rest of their lives, no matter who professionally young citizens of Russia become. They must learn to think without prejudice, independently evaluate certain historical events, distinguish genuine historical science from obscurantism, and, within the framework of scientific discussion, show tolerance for different points of view. One of the advantages that the new Russia has given us is the diversity of points of view and freedom of discussion, in contrast to the “Soviet yesterday”, when there was only one indisputable truth, let down by the propaganda department of the Central Committee of the CPSU.

Administrative calligraphy of history for the sake of the political situation is a thankless and dangerous task for customers. Historical truth can return to them like a boomerang, which, in case of a miss, always returns to the place of its departure.

Children during the Holocaust - Eyewitness accounts/Personal history

Multimedia essay

Keywords
Holocaust

Inga Auerbacher

Inga was the only daughter of Berthold and Regina Auerbacher, religious Jews who lived in Kippenheim, a village in southwestern Germany, near the Black Forest. Her father was a textile merchant. The family lived in a large 17-room house and kept servants to help with the housework.

1933-39: On November 10, 1938, hooligans threw stones and broke all the windows in our house. On the same day, the police arrested my father and grandfather. My mother and grandmother and I hid in the barn until everything was quiet. When we left, the Jewish men of our city had already been taken to the Dachau concentration camp. My father and grandfather were allowed to return home after a few weeks, but in May my grandfather died of a heart attack.

1940-45: When I was seven years old, I was deported with my parents to the Theresienstadt Ghetto in Czechoslovakia. When we got there, everything was taken away from us, except for the clothes we were wearing and my Marlene doll. Conditions in the camp were terrible. Potatoes were worth their weight in gold. I was hungry, scared, and sick most of the time. For my eighth birthday, my parents gave me a tiny potato casserole with just a bit of sugar in it, for my nineth birthday, a patchwork outfit for my doll, and when I was ten, a poem written by my mother.

On May 8, 1945, Inga and her parents were released from the Theresienstadt ghetto, where they spent about three years. In May 1946 they emigrated to the United States.

View