Little red story


Book Reviews for Little Red Riding Hood By Susanna Davidson and Mike Gordon

This website uses cookies. By using this website you agree with our cookie policy which you can review or amend at any time.

  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Little Red Riding Hood

Compare Prices Add to Wishlist

by

Susanna Davidson

,

Mike Gordon


Little Red Riding Hood Reviews | Toppsta

Book Rating: 5 based on 10

10 Reviews

Write a Review

A beloved fairy tale, retold for young children in classic picture book format. Arriving at Granny's cottage, Little Red Riding Hood can't help but wonder why Grandma has such big eyes, ears and teeth. Could it be something to do with the wolf her mum told her not to talk to on the way?

Little Red Riding Hood Reviews | Toppsta

9781409551690 Susanna Davidson https://toppsta.com/authors/profile/susanna-davidson

  • ISBN: 9781409551690
  • Pub Date: 1st January 2013
  • Publisher: Usborne Publishing Ltd
  • Imprint: Usborne Publishing Ltd.
  • Format: Paperback
  • Number of Pages: 24

Share on

  • Little Red Riding Hood
  • Little Red Riding Hood
  • Little Red Riding Hood
  • Little Red Riding Hood
See All 110 editions

Toppsta Blog

Videos

If you would like to provide a video review please sign up to our video panel.

If you like this try

  • Each Peach Pear Plum
    Each Peach Pear P...

    (143 Reviews)

  • Kitchen Disco
    Kitchen Disco

    (135 Reviews)

  • Five Minutes' Peace
    Five Minutes' Pea.
    ..

    (117 Reviews)

  • Superworm
    Superworm

    (105 Reviews)

  • We're Going on a Bear Hunt
    We're Going on a...

    (87 Reviews)

  • Room on the Broom
    Room on the Broom

    (83 Reviews)

Series

This is Book 118 in the Picture Books Series. See all Picture Books books here.

Book Lists

Category

See More Picture storybooks

Sign up to our newsletter for...

Free Book Giveaways, Recommendations & more

  • Reviews (0)
  • Top Tips (0)

Show More (0)

About Susanna Davidson

Susanna Davidson (Author)
Zanna Davidson enjoyed riding a Shetland pony called Jampot as a little girl, but deep down, she's always preferred dreaming up her own adventures. Zanna worked on a farm, and as a builder in Zimbabwe, before becoming a writer. She is the author of over forty books. Zanna currently lives in North London.

Seo Kim (Illustrator)
S

More about Susanna Davidson

Books by this author


  • Forgotten Fairy Tales of Brave and Brilliant Girls
  • Town Mouse and Country Mouse
  • Goldilocks and the Three Bears

BOOKS BY Susanna Davidson

About Mike Gordon

Carmela LaVigna Coyle lives out west in Colorado with her husband, Mike, their two college-age children, and her lovable, cuddly, precocious pup that gangly answers to the name of lulu.  Mike Gordon's award-winning illustrations span fiction, non-fiction, entertainment, and educational books worldwide. He lives in Santa Barbara, California.

More about Mike Gordon

Books by this illustrator


  • Goldilocks and the Three Bears
  • Pirate Pat
  • Emperor's New Clothes

BOOKS BY Mike Gordon

OTHER BOOKS IN THIS SERIES

  • How The Leopard Got His Spots
  • How the Rhino got his Skin
  • Oh Kate !

Picture Books BOOKS

Ratings

  • (10 Reviews)
  • (0 Reviews)
  • (0 Reviews)
  • (0 Reviews)
  • (0 Reviews)

Compare Book Prices

Little Red Riding Hood

by

Susanna Davidson

,

Mike Gordon

  • Pub Date: 1st January 2013
  • Format: Paperback
  • ISBN: 9781409551690
Retailer Price UK Delivery Cost Availability Total Buy Now

Find a Local Bookshop Prices and delivery costs are subject to change. If you buy books through these links, we may earn a commission from the retailer.

Little Red Riding Hood


This story is featured in Favorite Fairy Tales and Short Stories for Children.
You may want to compare it to The Brothers Grimm version, Little Red-Cap.


Once upon a time there was a dear little girl who was loved by every one who looked at her, but most of all by her grandmother, and there was nothing that she would not have given to the child. Once she gave her a little cap of red velvet, which suited her so well that she would never wear anything else. So she was always called Little Red Riding Hood.

One day her mother said to her, "Come, Little Red Riding Hood, here is a piece of cake and a bottle of wine. Take them to your grandmother, she is ill and weak, and they will do her good. Set out before it gets hot, and when you are going, walk nicely and quietly and do not run off the path, or you may fall and break the bottle, and then your grandmother will get nothing. And when you go into her room, don't forget to say, good-morning, and don't peep into every corner before you do it."

I will take great care, said Little Red Riding Hood to her mother, and gave her hand on it.

The grandmother lived out in the wood, half a league from the village, and just as Little Red Riding Hood entered the wood, a wolf met her. Little Red Riding Hood did not know what a wicked creature he was, and was not at all afraid of him.

"Good-day, Little Red Riding Hood," said he.

"Thank you kindly, wolf."

"Whither away so early, Little Red Riding Hood?"

"To my grandmother's."

"What have you got in your apron?"

"Cake and wine. Yesterday was baking-day, so poor sick grandmother is to have something good, to make her stronger."

"Where does your grandmother live, Little Red Riding Hood?"

"A good quarter of a league farther on in the wood. Her house stands under the three large oak-trees, the nut-trees are just below. You surely must know it," replied Little Red Riding Hood.

The wolf thought to himself, "What a tender young creature. What a nice plump mouthful, she will be better to eat than the old woman. I must act craftily, so as to catch both." So he walked for a short time by the side of Little Red Riding Hood, and then he said, "see Little Red Riding Hood, how pretty the flowers are about here. Why do you not look round. I believe, too, that you do not hear how sweetly the little birds are singing. You walk gravely along as if you were going to school, while everything else out here in the wood is merry."

Little Red Riding Hood raised her eyes, and when she saw the sunbeams dancing here and there through the trees, and pretty flowers growing everywhere, she thought, suppose I take grandmother a fresh nosegay. That would please her too. It is so early in the day that I shall still get there in good time. And so she ran from the path into the wood to look for flowers. And whenever she had picked one, she fancied that she saw a still prettier one farther on, and ran after it, and so got deeper and deeper into the wood.

Meanwhile the wolf ran straight to the grandmother's house and knocked at the door.

"Who is there?"

"Little Red Riding Hood," replied the wolf. "She is bringing cake and wine. Open the door."

"Lift the latch," called out the grandmother, "I am too weak, and cannot get up."

The wolf lifted the latch, the door sprang open, and without saying a word he went straight to the grandmother's bed, and devoured her. Then he put on her clothes, dressed himself in her cap, laid himself in bed and drew the curtains.

Little Red Riding Hood, however, had been running about picking flowers, and when she had gathered so many that she could carry no more, she remembered her grandmother, and set out on the way to her.

She was surprised to find the cottage-door standing open, and when she went into the room, she had such a strange feeling that she said to herself, oh dear, how uneasy I feel to-day, and at other times I like being with grandmother so much.

She called out, "Good morning," but received no answer. So she went to the bed and drew back the curtains. There lay her grandmother with her cap pulled far over her face, and looking very strange.

"Oh, grandmother," she said, "what big ears you have."

"The better to hear you with, my child," was the reply.

"But, grandmother, what big eyes you have," she said.

"The better to see you with, my dear."

"But, grandmother, what large hands you have."

"The better to hug you with."

"Oh, but, grandmother, what a terrible big mouth you have."

"The better to eat you with."

And scarcely had the wolf said this, than with one bound he was out of bed and swallowed up Little Red Riding Hood.

When the wolf had appeased his appetite, he lay down again in the bed, fell asleep and began to snore very loud. The huntsman was just passing the house, and thought to himself, how the old woman is snoring. I must just see if she wants anything.

So he went into the room, and when he came to the bed, he saw that the wolf was lying in it. "Do I find you here, you old sinner," said he. "I have long sought you."

Then just as he was going to fire at him, it occurred to him that the wolf might have devoured the grandmother, and that she might still be saved, so he did not fire, but took a pair of scissors, and began to cut open the stomach of the sleeping wolf.

When he had made two snips, he saw the Little Red Riding Hood shining, and then he made two snips more, and the little girl sprang out, crying, "Ah, how frightened I have been. How dark it was inside the wolf."

And after that the aged grandmother came out alive also, but scarcely able to breathe. Little Red Riding Hood, however, quickly fetched great stones with which they filled the wolf's belly, and when he awoke, he wanted to run away, but the stones were so heavy that he collapsed at once, and fell dead.

Then all three were delighted. The huntsman drew off the wolf's skin and went home with it. The grandmother ate the cake and drank the wine which Little Red Riding Hood had brought, and revived, but Little Red Riding Hood thought to herself, as long as I live, I will never by myself leave the path, to run into the wood, when my mother has forbidden me to do so.

It is also related that once when Little Red Riding Hood was again taking cakes to the old grandmother, another wolf spoke to her, and tried to entice her from the path. Little Red Riding Hood, however, was on her guard, and went straight forward on her way, and told her grandmother that she had met the wolf, and that he had said good-morning to her, but with such a wicked look in his eyes, that if they had not been on the public road she was certain he would have eaten her up. "Well," said the grandmother, "we will shut the door, that he may not come in."

Soon afterwards the wolf knocked, and cried, "open the door, grandmother, I am Little Red Riding Hood, and am bringing you some cakes."

But they did not speak, or open the door, so the grey-beard stole twice or thrice round the house, and at last jumped on the roof, intending to wait until Little Red Riding Hood went home in the evening, and then to steal after her and devour her in the darkness. But the grandmother saw what was in his thoughts. In front of the house was a great stone trough, so she said to the child, take the pail, Little Red Riding Hood. I made some sausages yesterday, so carry the water in which I boiled them to the trough. Little Red Riding Hood carried until the great trough was quite full. Then the smell of the sausages reached the wolf, and he sniffed and peeped down, and at last stretched out his neck so far that he could no longer keep his footing and began to slip, and slipped down from the roof straight into the great trough, and was drowned. But Little Red Riding Hood went joyously home, and no one ever did anything to harm her again.


You may enjoy reading a "fractured fairy tale" version of this story in rhyme, How Little Red Riding Hood Came to Be Eaten, and our collection of Favorite Fairy Tales.



The true story of Little Red Riding Hood


The true story of Little Red Riding Hood

© Tatyana Vorontsova

190 years ago, on October 18, 1812, two young scientists, the brothers Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm, put the final point in the book bestseller of German-language literature. The book was called “Children's and Household Tales”, and it was from it that the world became known

“Once upon a time there was a little, sweet girl. And whoever looked at her, everyone liked her, but her grandmother loved her more than anyone and was ready to give her everything. So she once gave her a cap of red velvet, and because this cap suited her very well and she didn’t want to wear any other, they called her Little Red Riding Hood ... ”Who in childhood was not fascinated by this seemingly naive, artless text? Nevertheless, the story of Little Red Riding Hood is not so simple: it is tortuous and intricate, just as human consciousness is tortuous and intricate.

The first literary version of this old folk tale was published by Charles Perrault in 1697 in Paris - in the book "Tales of my mother Goose, or Stories and tales of bygone times with teachings", dedicated to the princess of the French royal house. In those days, the story of a girl who went to visit her grandmother and met a wolf on the road was told all over Europe - both in the homes of commoners and in the castles of the nobility. The tale was especially popular in the Tyrol and the foothills of the Alps, where it had been known at least since the 14th century. Actually, it was a lot of stories: in the north of Italy, the granddaughter brought fresh fish to her grandmother, in Switzerland - a head of young cheese, in the south of France - a pie and a pot of butter; in some cases, the wolf was the winner, in others, the girl ... Perrault took one of the options as a basis, dressed up the nameless girl in a “companion” cap of scarlet velvet and bestowed the name - Little Red Riding Hood. I must say that in France at the turn of the 17th-18th centuries, when social differences in clothing were strictly regulated, only aristocrats and middle-class women wore such headdresses. A simple village girl, who easily walked in a velvet cap of a defiant color, and even - contrary to her mother's orders - entered into a conversation with a stranger, obviously understood a lot about herself, which the harsh era of the Enlightenment did not encourage. In the finale, the wolf taught a cruel lesson to all the windy young ladies: he "attacked Little Red Riding Hood and swallowed her."

The gallant author crowned the “cute trifle” (as he called his fairy tale) with a moral:

Little children, not without reason

(And especially girls, beauties and spoiled girls),

Encountering all kinds of men on the way,

No speeches

Otherwise, the wolf might eat them...

The popularity of Perrault's book was amazing, although the 69-year-old author himself, a prominent royal official and member of the French Academy, fearing ridicule, at first did not dare to put his own name on the collection, therefore for the first time, "Tales of Mother Goose" was published signed by the 11-year-old son of the writer - D'Armancourt.

But the “canonization” of the text did not end there. From the pages of a French book, Little Red Riding Hood returned to oral stories, and a hundred years later reappeared in a literary version - in German Kassel. This time, the philologists brothers Wilhelm and Jacob Grimm acted as authors, who saw in fairy tales by no means “trifles”. Grimms perceived folk tales as a necessary link in the unification of the fragmented German principalities-electors, who spoke different dialects, into a single national state. The goal of the Grimms was to collect and voice "living folk poetry", to preserve the authenticity of folk art. They believed that the “German pramith” was contained in fairy tales, and in their book “Children's and Household Tales” they selected only those stories that were popular in the territory of German settlement. Grimm's fairy tales were considered as pantries in which a single memory of the mythological ideas and beliefs of their ancestors was preserved, and they saw their task in revealing the “authenticity”, the true nationality of the plot. Based on the idea of ​​the unity of the people, the Grimms did not distinguish between written and oral sources, as well as the belonging of authors to different social and cultural strata, believing that in any of the options there is both truth and artificiality. They presented their own version of Little Red Riding Hood, combining oral stories, the fairy tale of Charles Perrault, as well as the verse play “The Life and Death of Little Red Riding Hood”, written in 1800 by the German romantic writer Ludwig Tiek (it was Tiek who introduced the hunter who saves the girl and grandmother from the belly of a wolf).

A feature of the fairy tale by the Brothers Grimm is the abundance of details, sometimes seeming nonsense, sometimes everyday life, sometimes just rudeness and cruelty. The girl's grandmother does not live in another village, but in the forest itself. Little Red Riding Hood brings her a piece of cake and a bottle of wine in her apron, and her mother sternly admonishes her: “Go modestly, as you should; don’t turn aside from the road, otherwise you’ll fall and break the bottle, then grandmother won’t get anything. And when you enter her room, do not forget to say hello to her, and not only to look back and forth in all corners first. The wolf reproachfully tells the girl that she is going, “as if she is in a hurry to go to school”, offers to “have fun in the forest”, and Little Red Riding Hood, succumbing to persuasion, enters the forest thicket and begins to collect flowers. Having eaten the grandmother, the wolf not only lays down in her bed, but first puts on a dress and cap. At the same time, he leaves the door wide open. Having swallowed the girl, the wolf snores so loudly throughout the forest that the hunter passing by the hut thinks if he needs to help the old woman. Seeing the wolf, the hunter takes the scissors and rips open the sleeping belly: “As soon as he made the first incision, he sees that the little red cap is visible inside. He quickly made a second incision, and a girl jumped out of there and screamed:

— Oh, how scared I was! It was so dark in the wolf's belly!

Grandmother also got out after Little Red Riding Hood, barely alive - she could not catch her breath.” Then the wolf is punished: his belly is stuffed with large stones. Waking up, he wants to run away, but heavy stones are pulled down, and the wolf falls dead. Each of the winners receives his reward: the hunter takes home the skin taken from the wolf, the grandmother, after eating a cake and drinking wine, gets better, and Little Red Riding Hood learns a life lesson: “From now on, I will never turn off the highway alone without my mother’s permission” . Soon the girl meets another wolf in the forest, and this meeting turns out to be fatal for him: Little Red Riding Hood and Grandmother drown the stupid villain in the trough without anyone's help.

The first publication of "Children's and Household Tales" did not arouse much enthusiasm. The Brothers Grimm's book was seen as a cross between a scientific document and children's fun, the publication was not bought up - readers demanded fabulous romantic short stories. However, after some time, either the authors successfully finalized the material, or the public got used to a strange mixture of archaic oral folk tradition and its literary fixation - the book began to diverge with a bang. Numerous translations were also not long in coming...

Since then, "Little Red Riding Hood" has become the most popular folk book fairy tale in Europe, and then in the world - always relevant and full of hidden meaning, which many tried to comprehend, sometimes crossing all sorts of boundaries in their conclusions.

So, since the fairy tales of the Brothers Grimm came out in the year of the victory over Napoleon, in 1812, and were collected at a time when the lands of the Rhine were under the French heel, some researchers saw the French “intruder” in the wolf, and the suffering German people in Little Red Riding Hood , and in the hunter - the expected disinterested liberator. And a century later, the ideologues of the Third Reich, who declared "Children's and Household Tales" by the Brothers Grimm a sacred book, wrote in all seriousness that Little Red Riding Hood embodies the German people, persecuted by the wolf of Jewry.

The Grimms themselves, deeply religious people, saw in Little Red Riding Hood a single symbol of rebirth - a descent into the darkness and transformation. A hundred years later, Christian researchers who developed this idea declared Little Red Riding Hood the personification of human passions: vanity, self-interest and hidden lust. In the wolf, these same passions are embodied clearly and definitely. Only freed from the wolf's belly, as if born again, the girl is transformed.

Neo-mythologists, supporters of the so-called “wolf-solar theory”, who also considered themselves followers of the Grimms, argued that the fairy tale reflects the change of natural phenomena: the grandmother living in the forest in a house “under three large oaks” is mother nature, Little Red Riding Hood is the sun , the wolf is winter, and the hunter is the new year. Neo-pagans (there were some) considered the wolf to be the most positive character in the fairy tale. The red color of the girl's headdress seemed to them the embodiment of danger, and the grandmother, living in a dense forest, evoked associations with Baba Yaga and the goddess of death of the ancient Germans (by the way, pies and wine were a common sacrifice for the dead and other representatives of the underworld among all Indo-Europeans). So the wolf seemed to them to be something like an ancestor hero, who was trying to free the world from death and fell victim in an unequal struggle.

Initially, in the oral tradition of the fairy tale about Little Red Riding Hood, the wolf was not just an animal, but a werewolf (this is where his ability to speak in a human voice and successful attempts to disguise himself as a grandmother come from). The Grimms, like Perrault, did not advertise it, but implied it. At the end of the 20th century, interest in mysticism provoked a number of relevant interpretations of Little Red Riding Hood, among which the most famous interpretation of the British "Oscar" Neil Jordan - he turned this story into a love thriller about werewolves "In the company of wolves".

People of the 19th century saw a pure image in Little Red Riding Hood. A fan of "Children's and Household Tales" Charles Dickens in his "Christmas Stories" shared naive childhood reflections: "I felt that if I could marry Little Red Riding Hood, I would know true happiness. " And the Grimms themselves, who dreamed of returning to their national roots, generally believed that before the world was asexual, and “people produced children with just one look (as God acts only with a thought)” - only “then they needed kisses for this and, finally, hugs and carnal intercourse." “Teutonic religious neurotics” (so the brothers were dubbed by little-believing psychoanalysts of the 20th century) when preparing fairy tales for publication, they expelled from them all to any extent erotic scenes and expressions, because they believed that “old poetry” was “innocent”.

The 20th century made Little Red Riding Hood a brand and a diagnosis. So, in the 30s, supporters of Freud's student Erich Fromm declared that Little Red Riding Hood is a fully matured girl, and her headdress is a symbol of physiological maturity. The mother's warnings to stay on the road and beware of breaking the bottle are warnings against casual relationships and loss of virginity. The main characters of the tale are three generations of women. The wolf, embodying the masculine principle, is a “ruthless and treacherous animal”, and the hunter is a conventional image of Little Red Riding Hood's father (which is why he is not among the despised men). In general, the story tells about the triumph of the female half of humanity over the male and returns the reader to the world of matriarchy.

In the 1960s, the era of the sexual revolution and the rise of feminism, researchers began to talk about swallowing as rape, a symbolic description of uncontrollable sexual appetite. At the same time, the girl herself provokes the wolf to active actions: she wears a bright hat, talks to a stranger, has fun in the forest ... At the same time, the wolf turns out to be a transvestite and secretly envies the woman's ability to become pregnant. That is why he swallows his grandmother and granddaughter whole, making an attempt to put living beings in his stomach. At the end of the wolf, stones are killed - symbols of sterility, which is a mockery of the desire to play childbirth . ..

There were not so many of those who remembered that Little Red Riding Hood was a fairy tale for children. They timidly pointed to the educational aspect: an innocent child should beware of life's dangers and obey mother's orders. The initial “innocence” of the story was also indicated by the fact that the wolf did not die when the hunter cut open his stomach in order to free the girl and grandmother.

The story of the second wolf was forgotten in the 20th century, it is not mentioned in all modern editions of the Brothers Grimm's fairy tales. In essence, this is a sequel, a story about a completely different girl - more experienced, correct, who has learned the lessons of the “previous series”. And Little Red Riding Hood, who has lost her innocent naivety, is not interesting to the world - even if it has comprehended everything and survived all possible revolutions ...

source: Everything for the teacher of literature


Read online "Little Red Book", Mao Zedong - LitRes

© Shapinov V. , Kagarlitsky B., compile, foreword, comments, 2020

© Rodina Publishing House LLC, 2020

countries with bizarre creatures with two heads or one eye, giants or, conversely, midgets. The country of history, by the will of modern storytellers, turns out to be inhabited by such creatures, often having little in common with people who actually lived. The difference is that for ancient storytellers, distant lands were just a way to speak about their neighbors, without directly touching on the affairs of shahs, viziers and other powerful people of this world. For modern storytellers, armed with the latest PR technologies, history turns out to be a fertile field for exercises in pleasing the powerful of this world, in protecting their power, wealth and authority from the illegal encroachments of some Ali Baba or from the poisonous witticisms of Khoja Nasreddin. Their instructive stories are aimed at unconditionally proving that the existing order of things is the best and most reasonable possible, and any attempts to change it lead only to the bloody madness of terror, the power of the darkest and basest instincts of the crowd, a gloomy dictatorship.

Heroes who laid down their lives in the struggle, such as Ernesto Che Guevara, who was shot in the jungles of Bolivia by CIA agents, still have a chance to receive a condescending pat on the shoulder from the modern masters of discourse. Like, they sought to make life better, their good intentions are worthy of respect, etc., etc. But as soon as the revolutionaries win and start, for good or bad, but transforming the world in the interests of those very disadvantaged, over whose misfortunes they shed decalitres of tears liberal humanists, then a condescending pat on the shoulder turns into annihilating blows. They can accept the great martyrs of the revolution, the dead heroes, but they will never accept the victorious living revolution.

Liberals, accustomed to giving the people material and spiritual benefits as alms, and accustomed to receiving due gratitude from the people for this, are indignant when the people themselves begin to take what they need without asking permission and permission. Then the people, in the eyes of a highly educated public, turn from a suffering lamb into a monster that has swung at the foundations of the foundations of civilization, and the leaders of this people appear as monsters in the square. The only remedy for the repetition of such "tragedies" is seen by the liberal humanists as a stronger frightening of the people with great upheavals, and especially their organizers. And now there are no bad means left to smear with black paint the historical portrait of those who swung at the old order - all the revolutionaries from the Jacobins to the Bolsheviks became victims of such processing, the basest goals and the most terrible means were attributed to them.

The moralizing denunciators of the revolution continue their work, despite the fact that, as Mikhail Lifshits once noted, if there hadn't been a revolution, they would probably still be standing with a tray behind the back of their master's chair ...

To a child who appeared on the light in Hunan province on the twelfth day of the eleventh month of the year of the Snake, or December 26, 1893, was destined to become one of the favorite targets of attack by professional supporters of "moderate progress within the bounds of legality" and enemies of leaps and revolutions.

Myths and legends are tenacious, especially when behind them stands the strength and power of modern media, multiplied by the prejudices of modern educated philistinism. It is not easy to fight against the demonic power of this well-organized ignorance. However, let's try to overturn some of the myths surrounding the name of the great Chinese revolutionary Mao Zedong. This must be done so that the reader has the opportunity to read the Chairman's texts not through the multi-layered prism of these myths, but with their own eyes.

The figure of Mao Zedong in the history of the 20th century is so significant that it is difficult to find an event of the second half of the last century where his influence would not be felt. In the 60s and 70s of the 20th century, a portrait of Mao could be seen not only in China, but also above the columns of rebellious students in Paris, found in duffel bags of Latin American partisans, he hung in the office of Jean-Paul Sartre and the shack of an Indian peasant who rebelled against the landowner. Mao was quoted by members of the American Negro rebel Black Panther Party, Peruvian Indians, and even the recently deceased President of the Congo, Laurent Desiree Kabila, wrote his political program, turning to the writings of the Chairman for advice.

However, in the 1920s, when Mao was just beginning his revolutionary "career", nothing seemed to indicate the role he was destined to play in the history of China and the world. When, on July 1, 1921, delegates from Beijing, Canton, Jinan, Changsha, Tokyo and other places gathered at the women's college in the French concession in Shanghai, the founding congress of the Communist Party of China, there was also a humble delegate from Hunan Province - Mao Zedong.

After returning to his home province, Mao was elected secretary of the Hunan branch of the CCP. At that time, in a multimillion-strong China, there were a little less than two hundred members of the Communist Party ... and political line decide everything. When the party line is right, everything else will follow. If there are no followers, followers will appear; if there are no rifles, rifles will appear; if the party has no political power, it will be able to win political power ". Mao will devote more than fifty years of his life to the struggle for the correct ideological and political line.

From the very beginning to the end, these fifty years of the Chairman's struggle are surrounded by a dense cloud of myths, overlapping each other and distorting the historical truth beyond recognition.

Thus, the literature about the leader of the Chinese revolution is dominated by the opinion that Mao Zedong is a peasant leader and has nothing to do with the working class. This point of view was also cultivated by Soviet propaganda, which thus tried to reinforce its thesis about the “petty-bourgeoisness” of Mao himself and his criticism of the policies of Khrushchev, Brezhnev and the late Soviet order. For Western researchers, the thesis “Mao is a peasant leader” is a saving straw, grasping at which one can say that Marxism, which insists on the leading role of the proletariat, was only an external form, phraseology of the Chinese revolution, and the essence was the mysterious “Chinese specificity”, not subject to European rationalistic theories. From here - one step to denying the universality of world history and reducing it to an irreconcilable "conflict of civilizations", where some civilizations become a stronghold of European culture and democracy, while others become a stronghold of Asian barbarism and despotism, to a theory that has become the banner of American wars in Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq and justification for the preparation of a war against Iran.

However, even when China's 250 million peasants accounted for about one and a half million industrial workers, most of whom were concentrated in coastal cities and worked for foreign capital, Mao focused on organizing workers.

In those years, the factory orders of England during the industrial revolution with 12-14-hour working days and barracks discipline, ousted from Europe by the organized labor movement, came to the colonies and semi-colonies, just beginning their industrial development. Here is how Sherwood Eddy, an activist of the US trade union movement, who visited China in those years, describes the working conditions prevailing in the Celestial Empire:

« A match factory in Beijing employs about a thousand workers, many of whom are children aged 9 to 15. The working day starts at half past five in the morning and lasts until half past six in the evening, with a break of only a few minutes. This continues seven days a week. There is no ventilation, the rooms are full of harmful vapors of phosphorus. Half an hour later my throat burned, while the workers breathe this air for a whole shift. On average, 80 people fall ill every day.

I also visited a textile factory where 15,000 young people work. ... Ten people live in a tiny cell of the hostel: five work during the day, five at night ... The workers sleep on wooden boards, hiding behind torn mats. The worst thing for them is not to hear the howling of the factory siren: latecomers are thrown out into the street. These people don't live. They just exist0060".

Orders of the factory barracks in the city, plus the omnipotence of the landowner, the purchase of brides, faith in spirits, periodic famine in the countryside - this was the last word of the “thousand-year-old civilization”, the foundations of which were supposedly forcibly broken by the communist revolution.

Only a few fragments of Mao's work on organizing workers clearly demonstrate that this man was not at all the Chinese version of Emelyan Pugachev.

Until 1920, the only form of workers' organization in Hunan, where Mao worked as party secretary, was the professional guilds inherited from the Middle Ages. However, on November 19In 2020, two anarchist students, Huang Ai and Pang Renquan, founded the Hunan Workers' Association, the province's first workers' union, with about 2,000 workers a year later. Huang and Pan soon joined the Socialist Youth League under the influence of Mao. Mao paid great attention to the organization of the labor movement, emphasizing the need for the political struggle of the workers. He wrote in the newspaper "Working weekly": " The organization is needed not just to force the employer to shorten the working day and raise wages through strikes. The organization must awaken class consciousness and fight for the interests of the entire class of employees ".

In 1922, a strike broke out in the city of Huashi at a cotton-spinning factory, the administration of which refused to pay workers an annual remuneration. Governor Zhao summoned strike leaders Huang and Pang to talks, during which he promised to pay the workers what was owed. But then both young people were executed. Zhao's treachery shocked all of China. President Sun Yat-sen himself demanded to punish the governor. The actions of the governor led to the activation of the labor movement, which allowed Mao to expand the work even more widely. He creates a network of evening schools in which party members worked as teachers, writes a textbook that not only allows you to master writing, but also acquaints the reader with socialist ideas. On September 19For 22 years, railway workers, demanding higher wages and better working conditions, took to the rails and blocked traffic. Troops sent to restore order opened fire on the strikers. Six people were killed and many, including women, were injured. Mao called for a fight: “ Comrades! Only the working class is subjected to such cruel, inhuman humiliations. Is there a limit to our anger? Can our hatred be measured? How strong will our rebuff be? Revenge, revenge! Workers of the whole country, rise up to fight the enemy! "- such an appeal was sent by Mao to the workers' organizations.

At Mao's suggestion, the coal miners with whom he had worked since September 1921 joined the strike. The strike expanded, and under the threat of its development into a nationwide one, the authorities agreed to comply with the demands of the strikers. It was a big win. In September 1922, Mao created the Union of Masons and Carpenters, which included more than a thousand people. On October 5, the Union went on strike to raise wages. After 12 days, the authorities created a conciliation commission and sternly warned the workers: “Stubbornness will not lead to good. Think before it's too late." The commission offered prices that were higher than the old ones, but did not satisfy the demands of the strikers.

On 23 October it was decided to hold a protest march. The authorities banned the march. Many activists hesitated. But Mao persuaded the workers to fight to the end. The next day, a column of four thousand masons and carpenters took to the streets. Among them, in the clothes of a simple worker, was Mao. The governor's adjutant came out to the workers. “ When I was walking along Square at about ten in the evening,” a casual witness of the events wrote, “ my attention was attracted by an interesting sight ... I see how an official climbs onto a bench and calls on those gathered to return to their families. One of the workers invites his comrades to express their opinion by voting, but not a single hand is raised to the question of whether there are those who want to go home. “Here is our answer to you,” the worker turned to the official ". The worker who spoke to the governor's adjutant was Mao. The strike achieved its goal. Rates were raised, moreover, the governor decided that pricing issues would be resolved on an equal basis by agreement of the parties, and not through medieval guilds, as before. Thus Mao put an end to the rule of the guilds, that legacy of hundreds of years of feudalism, in Changsha.

However, the revolution in China did not really go along the classical European path "from the city to the countryside", but vice versa - "from the village to the city". Mao Zedong was one of the first to understand this. At 19In 27, after the bloody defeat of the workers' uprising in the cities, the Communist Party of China proceeds to create a peasant Red Army, which, guided by Mao's teachings about a protracted people's war, defeated the troops of the Kuomintang - the party of the Chinese bourgeoisie in 1949 and established the People's Republic of China.

But the revolutionary war and the victory of the army of poor peasants were not the end of the revolution for Mao. On the contrary, this is just the beginning. The peasant army is a way to overthrow the old power, but the transformation of society is the work of organized workers.

However, the "peasant war" that led to victory in 1949 was not a simple peasant war, it was waged under the leadership of a party that was brought up by the struggle of urban workers and whose theoretical basis was Marxism - proletarian, not peasant, theory.

In the national liberation movement it is necessary to uphold the hegemony of the proletariat, ,” wrote Mao Zedong [1] . - Only the working class is the most far-sighted, disinterested and consistently revolutionary class. The entire history of the revolution testifies that without the leadership of the working class, the revolution suffers defeat, and with it, it wins.0060 » [2] .

* * *

« Why is the ancient cathedral full of holes? “Because for a hundred years the obese priest here, hiccuping, took bribes and sold vodka,” wrote the great Russian poet Alexander Blok in 1919. - Why do they shit in the noble estates dear to the heart? - Because girls were raped and flogged there: not at that gentleman’s, but at the neighbor’s. Why are century-old parks being felled? - Because for a hundred years under their spreading lindens and maples, the gentlemen showed their power: they poked a beggar in the nose - rich, and a fool - education. Everything is so ".

People's energy turns against culture - opponents of the revolution like to emphasize this. But they do not notice what the sharp eye of the poet Blok noticed. The fact that for centuries culture has turned against the people, and a culture created at the expense of the people. For centuries, in order for one to enjoy painting, a book, compose poetry or write music, dozens had to clean the outhouse, stand at the bench, loosen the earth.

Naturally, when these dark masses rise to historical creativity, they may have a negative attitude towards a culture alienated from them. The fault in this, of course, is not the masses themselves, but the system of the division of labor, which made the achievements of art and science inaccessible to them. The revolution, however, not only releases this “negative” energy of the people, but also for the first time opens a window into the world of culture for them, shows that culture, which has developed in an alienated form, actually belongs to the people.

In the 20th century, a social revolution swept over semi-feudal, peasant, sleeping China, and, of course, the conditions predetermined that the cultural struggle trend in this revolution turned out to be strong.

During the Mao period, people made holes in more than one temple. And today, in any textbook on the history of China, you can read about the "outrages of the Red Guards." But where and when did history do without such "outrages", if the way of life that had existed for centuries changed? The French Revolution cut off the head of the great physicist Lavoisier, however, without the revolution of 1789there would be no modern Europe for a year, and it is unlikely that any of the French would want to plant the aristocracy, the clergy and the king on their necks in order to save the life of a scientist at such a price.

Americans in Baghdad plundered the greatest museum, where unique exhibits of ancient cultures of Mesopotamia were stored, historical monuments were destroyed. What textbooks talk about it? According to various estimates, from 600 thousand to 1 million people died as a result of the war in Iraq ... And you continue to count the victims of the revolution?

The crisis situation is developing objectively and the society itself falls into the abyss of violence, which is practiced by all the fighting parties. It is another matter that the revolution uses violence to create the new, while the counter-revolution uses violence to preserve the old. The army of the revolution and the army of the counter-revolution are often dressed in the same clothes, they use the same weapons, but their goals are different and those who put an equal sign between them on the basis of the first and do not see the second are deeply wrong.

But the revolution, destroying the old institutions, creates new spaces for culture, never seen before. Attracting millions to govern the state, to restructure the economy, the social revolution not only gives them the opportunity to master culture, but in a sense obliges them to do so, because the tasks of the revolution cannot be solved without a high cultural level.

Yes, they read Mao's quotes in China. But it is important to understand the significance of this collection for the specific conditions of the Celestial Empire in those years. An eyewitness to the events of the Cultural Revolution, the Frenchman Jean Delin wrote in his book The Economy of China: “ Mao's ideas and their almost miraculous properties, which are attributed to them in China, were ridiculed. Indeed, the regime's propaganda often extols them so much that we cannot help but be amazed, but the catechism of civic virtue, such as The Red Book, is a factor in progress. If its effectiveness is difficult to comprehend by representatives of Western countries who have been making their "cultural revolution" for several centuries, it is because they do not understand how backward the consciousness of the peasants is. The transformations carried out in a short period of time are evidenced by the statement of the director of one people’s commune to a foreigner: “In the old days (i. e. before 1949) the peasants attributed plant diseases to the actions of the gods and did nothing to combat them. Now every production team has a person involved in identifying the most common diseases and means of combating them. Before the Liberation, the peasants believed that the dragon god controlled the rains, and now they know their scientific reasons » [3] .

Of course, it is customary for "intellectuals" to spit from above on the ignorant and downtrodden masses, who are only taking their first independent intellectual steps and for whom the quotation book is a primer of Marxism. But by doing so, such an "intellectual" will only show his own low moral level. A first grader reads a primer, not Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky, and only a fool would reproach him for this.

Nevertheless, revolutions are always and everywhere reproached for having to start from a very low level and for giving the masses a "primitive" primer. Only at the same time they forget that this low level is inherited by the revolution from the old society. Having passed the primer, you can begin to read more seriously, thus, the “revolutionary primer” makes a hole in the wall that separates culture for the “elite” from “culture” for the cattle in a class society.

In the first years of the revolution, Mayakovsky wrote poems promoting boiling water. And this speaks not against Mayakovsky, but against the backwardness in which our people lived before 1917 years old. In China, this backwardness was immeasurably greater.

Every revolution awakens not only the best qualities of the people. In the troubled waters of historical action, there are always those who want to catch their fish, often saying the most “correct” words. It is only with this in mind that one can appreciate the great movements of the past.

But excesses, even if they come from the masses themselves and are not imposed by the "Left" feverish leaders, must be criticized. But the criticism itself must be carried out from the standpoint of the future, and not the old society, otherwise it will be nothing more than a call to return to the old barn.

The Chinese Revolution gave the masses a voice. Here appeared a unique form of freedom of speech - dazibao. Dazibao means "newspaper written by hand in large characters", it was hung out in specially designated places, or simply in crowded places. Dazibao could be hung out by anyone of their own free will, there was no censorship for them, and Mao Zedong personally included a clause in the text of the Constitution of the PRC stating that hanging datsibao is the right of a Chinese citizen.

Under capitalism, public expression by the masses of their opinion is practically excluded. Of course, in a bourgeois democracy, everyone can go out into the street and shout whatever he wants, but this will not affect anything. The mass media are in the hands of large monopolies and act as an active principle in relation to the so-called "public opinion". That is, public opinion is not reflected in the media, but on the contrary, capital forms “public opinion” with the help of the media.

« The thoughts of the ruling class are the ruling thoughts in every epoch. This means that the class which represents the dominant material force of society is at the same time its dominant spiritual force. The class that has the means of material production at its disposal also has the means of spiritual production, and because of this, the thoughts of those who do not have the means for spiritual production turn out to be generally subordinate to the ruling class.0060 " [4] ," wrote K. Marx and F. Engels in "The German Ideology".

Under socialism the means of spiritual production are appropriated by the proletariat. First, through the development of class consciousness through general education and involvement in the management of society. Secondly, by expropriating the technical means of disseminating information - printing houses, radio, television stations, etc. what the state is. And this gives rise to the possibility of all sorts of bureaucratic abuses, such as “clamping down criticism”, etc. In principle, this is not such a serious problem for a society developing towards communism, but in the conditions of a backward country and pressure from imperialism and revisionism, the matter becomes more complicated.

Therefore, the form of dazibao found by the Chinese communists became a powerful means of direct democracy, protection of the proletariat from its own officials, and true freedom of speech, not for a narrow circle of journalists, writers, philosophers, critics, but for the broad masses. The content of dazibao was not censored by anyone, and they became a significant factor in the social life of China in the Mao era. The most significant dazibao were reprinted in newspapers and broadcast on the radio.

The cultural revolution began with the Dazibao. This dazibao was a leaflet written by Nie Yuanzi, an assistant in the philosophy department, and six undergraduate and graduate students, criticizing the leadership of Peking University, as well as the Beijing City Party Committee. The authors of the dazibao criticized the university leadership for clamping down on criticism and forbidding public meetings and open discussion of political life. The appearance of this dazibao signaled the beginning of a mass movement among university students against the first secretary of the party committee and university rector Lu Ping. And a broader movement throughout the country against the suppression of criticism, the bureaucratization of the party and the state, as well as for the further movement towards communism, which the conservative groups of the bureaucracy held back in every possible way.

In the French economist Charles Bettelheim's China 1972: Economics, Industry and Education after the Cultural Revolution, worker Liu Mingyi, leader of a propaganda group at Tsinghua University in Beijing, talks about Lu Ping's reign:

accepting bourgeois and reactionary professors into it, and thus transforming it into a "party of professors", all permeated with academic power. ... While the dictatorship of the proletariat operated in the country, Tsinghua University was under the rule of the bourgeoisie. Yang Nanxiang held both posts - rector and party secretary of the university. In ideology, he worshiped the individualistic theory of knowledge, which asserted things like: “go to school to make a name for yourself”, “leave school as a specialist, a high-ranking person who will occupy high positions in the social hierarchy and will earn a lot » [5] .

Mao Zedong personally instructed to reprint the dazibao of undergraduate and graduate students of Peking University in national newspapers and read it on the radio. In addition to Nie Yuanzi's text, the People's Daily, the central organ of the Communist Party of China, also published the article "We welcome the first dazibao of Peking University." The article said that while a campaign against the reactionary bureaucracy is unfolding in the country, “ at Peking University are hindering this movement. Cold and carrion reign here, the urgent revolutionary demands of the broad masses of teachers and students are suppressed » [6] .

Thus began a kind of "revolution within a revolution", the struggle of the masses against the inert state and party apparatus under the leadership of the left part of the party leaders and Mao himself. The supporters of the chairman felt that if “everything was as it was” and did not move the revolution forward, then the threat of degeneration and restoration would become a reality, an example of which could already be the “stagnant” order in the USSR.

In June-July 1966, students of all metropolitan universities launched a struggle against the party and administrative leadership of educational institutions. The struggle was carried out in various forms and quickly moved from rather peaceful forms (hanging dazibao, rallies) to fighting sometimes with the use of violence against party bosses. They were forced to attend rallies, where they were exposed as counter-revolutionaries, they hung signs with offensive inscriptions around their necks, etc. Students stormed the premises of party committees and university administrations, throwing the leadership out into the street.

The activity of the students and their readiness to defend the revolutionary line prompted Mao and other left-wing leaders of the CPC to make the main stake at this stage of the revolution on the students. This bet on youth and students inspired the rebellious students of Paris in 1968, for them Mao became the living god of the revolution. But if in Europe the leftist students have lost, then in China they have achieved serious success.

The student movement took the form of mass non-partisan youth organizations. Leaders of the new movement appeared in the metropolitan universities: Nie Yuanzi at Peking University, Kuai Dafu at Tsinghua University, Tan Houlan at Peking Normal University, Han Aijin at the Beijing Aviation Institute, Wang Dabin at the Beijing Mining Institute. Those of them who did not give up their revolutionary beliefs after the coming to power of the Chinese Gorbachev - Deng Xiaoping spent many years in prison.

Organizations of student youth were called "Red Guards", which is usually translated as "Red Guards". The associations of working youth formed during the Cultural Revolution were called "jiao-fans", which means "rebels". The words "Hongweiping" and "Jiaofan" for the Great Chinese Revolution mean about the same thing as the word "sans-culotte" for the Great French Revolution of the 18th century or "strike" for the Russian Revolution of 1905-1907, that is, the general name of the revolutionary-minded representatives of the people . The Hongweiping organizations were autonomous and acted in accordance with their own understanding of Marxism, they were not subordinate to party or state institutions. The Hongweiping organizations were a form of self-organization of the people for the implementation of direct proletarian democracy and opposition to the restoration of capitalism.

The young Red Guards who overthrew the old party bureaucrats were also a radical break with the Confucian tradition, which for millennia had consolidated the authority of the government, the family and the older generation. The radical break acted not only as a class conflict of the proletariat against the national and petty bourgeoisie and representatives of the party bureaucracy associated with it, but also as a conflict of generations, "fathers and sons." Thus, one of the results of the Cultural Revolution was the fact that representatives of a new generation of Chinese took command posts. For example, in Shanghai at 19In 74, out of 50 thousand heads of administrative bodies, departments, factories, trade enterprises, half were people under 30 years old [7] .

Mao himself did not at all encourage the extreme actions of the Red Guards, on the contrary, he showed that their activity should be part of a broad revolutionary movement towards communism: . If he cannot liberate all of humanity, then the proletariat itself will not be able to truly achieve liberation.” I ask comrades to also pay attention to this truth » [8] , the Chairman wrote in a letter from one of the Red Guard organizations.


Learn more