Make sentence for


Sentence Examples | Examples of Words Used in a Sentence

Advertisement

A Word Can Be Used in a Sentence Many Ways

Sometimes to understand a word's meaning you need more than a definition; you need to see the word used in a sentence. At YourDictionary, we give you the tools to learn what a word means and how to use it correctly. With this sentence maker, simply type a word in the search bar and see a variety of sentences with that word used in its different ways. Our sentence generator can provide more context and relevance, ensuring you use a word the right way.

How Do Our Sentence Examples Help You?

Whether it’s simple sentences for those just learning the English language or phrasing for an academic paper, this easy-to-use sentence generator will help you choose your words with confidence.

With our sentence examples, seeing a word within the context of a sentence helps you better understand it and know how to use it correctly. From long to short, simple to complex, this tool can assist you with how to use words that may have more than one meaning.

How to See a Word Used in a Sentence

If you want to hear how the word is said, we can assist with that too. Just click on the speaker icon at the top of the page to listen to a clear pronunciation of the word.

What is a Sentence?

There are many types of sentences, all with different structures and complexities. In its most basic form, a sentence is made up of a subject and predicate, which is the verb and the words that follow. But no matter how simple or complex, a sentence consists of words. Words in a sentence are what make it come alive and make sense.

Understand how words are used within the sentence, no matter the structure, and get inspiration for writing your own sentence correctly with the help of these example sentences.

We’re Here to Make Learning Easy

We get it. Learning the meaning of the many words that make up the English language can seem overwhelming. Take away the nerves and make it simple and easy to understand with the use of our sentence maker.

YourDictionary strives to make learning as stress-free as possible, no matter what your age or understanding is. And our sentence examples are no different.

We understand that sometimes the best way to truly understand a new concept is to see it used in an example. With the help of our useful tool, you can be one step ahead with grasping the complexity and workings of English vocabulary.

With an increased understanding of how words can be used, you can make your writing come to life with an arsenal of words of varying difficulties and meanings.

Simply type the word into the sentence generator and we’ll do the rest.

English Sentences with Audio Using the Word "For"

English Sentences with Audio Using the Word "For"
Good for you.
Fry an egg for me.
It's time for bed.
She cooks for him.
I answered for him.
He asked for a beer.
He works for a bank.
It'll rain for sure.
She called for help.
Thank you for today.
This isn't for sale.
I don't care for him.
It's all over for us.
It's time for dinner.
Thank you for coming.
This will do for now.
Be quiet for a moment.
I am no match for him.
I don't care for eggs.
I don't care for wine.
I made a doll for Ann.
She asked for my help.
She screamed for help.
This room is for rent.
This room is for VIPs.
Don't ask me for money.
Don't be late for work.
I asked her for a date.
I studied for one hour.
I'm looking for my key.
It's time for us to go.
She applied for a visa.
She is cooking for him.
Tom held a seat for me.
I don't care for coffee.
I'm looking for a house.
That's enough for today.
Tom applied for the job.
Tom was late for dinner.
We gave him up for dead.
Grandpa bought it for me!
He looks old for his age.
I waited for ten minutes.
I'm sorry for being late.
It's for my personal use.
We felt sympathy for her.
What will you use it for?
You can ask Tom for help.
Can you mail these for me?
Gasoline is used for fuel.
He was in time for school.
I have a surprise for you.
I have to look for my pen.
I was at a loss for words.
I'm going out for a while.
I'm looking for a sweater.
She has an eye for beauty.
She met him for breakfast.
Thank you for inviting me.
Thank you for your letter.
Tom asked for more coffee.
Are you ready for the trip?
Do you charge for delivery?
He did well for a beginner.
He has an eye for antiques.
He let me stay for a night.
I am just going for a walk.
I asked for their approval.
I bought it for 10 dollars.
I turned to him for advice.
I'll call for you at three.
I'll play a sonata for you.
I'm dying for a cold drink.
I'm saving money for a car.
It's about time for dinner.
Now is the time for action.
She bought a shirt for him.
She waited for him to call.
Should I wait for you here?
Stay here and wait for him.
What are you lining up for?
Where do I pay for the gas?
Could you draw a map for me?
Don't be late for the train.
He can pull strings for you.
He has been sick for a week.
How do you account for that?
How long do you want it for?
I am dying for a cold drink.
I bought it for ten dollars.
I haven't seen you for ages.
I mistook him for Mr. Brown.
I need to search for my pen.
I thanked Mary for her help.
I'll act as a guide for you.
I'll buy a watch for my son.
Is the job too much for you?
My son is small for his age.
Please prepare for the trip.
She cooks for him every day.
She made a new suit for him.
Thanks for bringing me here.
Thanks for your explanation.
Tom thanked me for the gift.
We will do anything for you.
When is a good time for you?
He exchanged yen for dollars.
He gave it to me for nothing.
He was late for the 7:30 bus.
I got the ticket for nothing.
I lived abroad for ten years.
It's necessary for you to go.
She asked him for some money.
She thanked him for his help.
She waited for him for hours.
The train didn't wait for me.
This chair is too low for me.
Would you join me for a walk?
Eleven o'clock is good for me.
He asked his friends for help.
He was looking for a good job.
I admire you for your courage.
I hear he is looking for work.
I talked with her for an hour.
I went for a walk in the park.
I went for a walk with my son.
I'm dying for a cup of coffee.
Let's take a break for coffee.
May I go out for a short walk?
May I take a rest for a while?
She isn't good enough for him.
She married him for his money.
She stayed there for a moment.
Thank you for the information.
Thank you for your invitation.
The desk is too small for Meg.
They waited for him for hours.
This work is difficult for us.
Tom has an eye for modern art.
We must make up for lost time.
What do you learn English for?
Will you help me for a minute?
Would you do something for me?
Are you for or against my plan?
Are you prepared for the worst?
He came to ask us for our help.
He lived abroad for many years.
I lived overseas for ten years.
I think it's time for me to go.
I was told to wait for a while.
I'd like to stay for one night.
I'm still waiting for my order.
I'm used to cooking for myself.
Is this the bus for Park Ridge?
Now he has nothing to live for.
Please wait around for a while.
She bought a toy for her child.
She scolded him for being late.
She took him for all his money.
She was in the mood for a walk.
Thanks for coming over tonight.
That desk is too small for Meg.
Tom was singled out for praise.
We made pancakes for breakfast.
What did you eat for breakfast?
What did you get for Christmas?
What do you need the money for?
What do you want for breakfast?
Would you care for more coffee?
An expert was called for advice.
Are you for or against his idea?
Children often ask me for money.
Do you have any messages for me?
Do you have anything for a cold?
Do you have change for a dollar?
Fred often comes late for class.
Has he lived here for two years?
He is about to leave for London.
He is unpopular for some reason.
He left for New York a week ago.
He likes to cook for his family.
I go for a walk every other day.
I paid 2,000 yen for this atlas.
I'll be staying here for a week.
I'm busy preparing for the trip.
I'm leaving for Canada tomorrow.
I'm leaving town for a few days.
I'm saving money for my old age.
It's no use asking him for help.
My mother made a sweater for me.
She dumped him for a richer man.
She listened to music for hours.
She praised him for his honesty.
She prayed for her son's return.
She sang a Japanese song for us.
She translated it word for word.
She waited for him to come home.
Thank you for coming to meet me.
The old man begged me for money.
The road is too narrow for cars.

How does the Judge pronounce the Sentence? - Website of the Governor of the Pskov region

How does the judge decide? A verdict is a final decision on a clearly defined case, on the issues raised in this case. It is quite obvious that the verdict is passed exclusively after all the witnesses, the accused, the victim, etc., have been questioned and interrogated, and also after all the evidence has been studied in detail .

What is sentencing?

Judgment rendered by the court as a result of the trial of the case. Guilty sentence . Pass sentence .

What does the judge take into account when passing a sentence?

Among the first may be pregnancy, the presence of young children in the perpetrator, the immorality of the behavior of the victim, the most common point is the surrender, active contribution to the investigation of the crime and the exposure of accomplices. Other circumstances may be taken into account at the discretion of the judges .

Who decides the judge or prosecutor?

When sentencing, the prosecution proposes its own version, and the judge pronounces sentence and approves the chosen measure.

Which court decides?

You can help Wikipedia by adding information for other countries and regions. Sentence is a procedural act of justice. This is the decision of the court ( judge ) on the guilt or innocence of the defendant and the imposition of punishment on him, or on his release from punishment, issued on by court of the first or appellate instance (Article 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation).

What does it mean that the verdict has entered into force?

If sentence is passed by a court of first instance (as a rule, it is a district or city court), then it enters into force after the expiration of the term for its appeal in the appeal procedure, if it has not been appealed by the parties.

What is an unjust decision?

Therefore, an unjust decision of a judge is the same as a “non-engineering” decision decision of an engineer, or “non-border” decision of a border guard, etc. That is, this is decision , which is not characteristic (does not correspond) to the professional activity of the person who accepted it.

What should the court do if the defendant refuses to testify?

If the defendant refuses to testify previously given during the preliminary investigation or inquiry , the court is obliged to carefully investigate and find out the reasons for such behavior. Without their clarification interrogation the defendant at the trial will not contribute to the correct resolution of the case, and the sentence will not be justified (see

,

reasonable and fair, if it is decided in accordance with the requirements of this Code and is based on the correct application of the criminal law.0005

What should be reflected in the sentence?

Sentence reflects the defendant's attitude to the charge and evaluates the arguments he has brought in his defence. If there are grounds for verifying the defendant's application in the manner prescribed by Article 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, the court sends it to the head of the relevant body of preliminary investigation.

Who is the chief prosecutor or judge?

Who is more important who has more significant opportunities

It is impossible to say unequivocally that judge is higher than prosecutor . The activities of these persons are regulated by various regulations. Their tasks in the course of the court session do not intersect, but only complement each other.

Who is higher the prosecutor or the investigator?

V. Prosecutor's Office is a supervising body, including the work of the Investigative Committee, in terms of compliance with the criminal procedure law in the investigation of criminal cases. So, as a general rule, the opinion of the prosecutor's office has priority.

Which is higher the prosecutor's office or the court?

Historically, the prosecutor's office in Russia is almost stronger in strength and is higher than the court . The vague concept of ‘supervision of the rule of law’ both in Soviet times and in modern Russia allows prosecutors to interfere in the activities of any structures, including courts .

The court in The Hague delivered a verdict in the case of the crash of a Boeing 777 in the Donbass - RBC

The court acquitted one of the four defendants in the Mh27 case. The other three were found guilty, according to the court, they wanted to shoot down a military aircraft, but mistakenly hit a Boeing. The amount of compensation to the relatives of the victims of the disaster will exceed €16 million

Photo: Brendan Hoffman / Getty Images

The court found the Russians Igor Girkin (Strelkov), Sergey Dubinsky and Ukrainian Leonid Kharchenko guilty of crashing Mh27 and killing 298 people. Russian Oleg Pulatov was acquitted in the case. Those found guilty of the Mh27 crash are ordered by the court to pay the families of the victims at least €16 million in compensation. Girkin, Dubinsky and Kharchenko were sentenced in absentia to life imprisonment.

According to the court, there is no sufficient evidence to support Pulatov's involvement in the deployment of the Buk air defense system near Pervomaisky. The court also did not find evidence that he could have prevented the launch of the rocket.

The court concluded that flight Mh27 was shot down by a Buk air defense system from a field near Pervomaisky, which at that time was under the control of the DPR. The Court considers that "combat immunity" could exempt the accused from liability - this principle states that the responsibility of the military command does not arise in a combat situation or in the conduct of military events. However, the court notes, this principle does not apply in this case, since the defendants were not members of the Russian regular army and Russia was not responsible for their actions.

adv.rbc.ru

The investigation failed to establish exactly how the crew of the Buk air defense missile system acted, the court stated, as well as to find out who exactly gave the order to launch the missile. However, the judges point out that the launch could not have been accidental. At the same time, according to the court, those involved in the launch believed that they were firing at a military aircraft, and not at a civilian one.

adv.rbc.ru

During the process, the court also called the actions of the prosecution, which published the materials of the investigation in the public domain on the Internet, unlawful. Thus, the prosecutor's office violated the direct decision of the court, he pointed out. However, the court refused any sanctions against the prosecution.

Russian lawyers interviewed by RBC are confident that the verdict does not entail any consequences for Russia. The head of the vvCube consulting group, Vadim Tkachenko, noted that in 2014 Russia was not a party to the conflict in eastern Ukraine and the court passed a verdict against individuals who made the decision to launch the rocket on their own. “If this is the case, then no new sanctions can be applied to Russia or funds recovered in favor of the relatives of the dead passengers, they must be recovered from the persons found guilty,” the lawyer says.

Dmitry Kletochkin, a partner at the law firm Rustam Kurmaev & Partners, shares the same point of view. “There is no mechanism for the actual enforcement of this verdict,” he also notes. “The defendants are convicted in absentia, that is, they are not present in the courtroom, and in the future they will almost certainly not be extradited by Russia, which means that the sentence will not be carried out.” Kletochkin also recalled that after the start of a special military operation, such a wave of sanctions fell on Russia, against which the possible negative consequences of this verdict look insignificant.

Senator Andrei Klishas, ​​after the court's verdict, reminded in his telegram channel that, according to the Constitution, the extradition of Russian citizens is unacceptable. “Article 61: 1. A citizen of the Russian Federation cannot be expelled from the Russian Federation or extradited to another state,” he quoted the Basic Law.

Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777 en route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur crashed in Donbass on July 17, 2014. On board were 298 people, including 196 Dutch, all passengers and crew members were killed. The investigation continued for several years, it was complicated by the fact that the plane crashed in a combat zone. In July 2015, Malaysia proposed to the UN Security Council that a tribunal be set up to investigate the case, but Russia used its veto to block the decision.

The International Investigation Team (JIT), which included representatives from several countries, including Ukraine, but did not include representatives from Russia, concluded that the plane was shot down by a Buk launcher.

The Russian Foreign Ministry pointed out that international investigators removed Moscow from full participation in the investigation, while representatives of Ukraine took part in the investigation.

The participating countries of the JIT have decided that the prosecution and trial of suspects will be conducted in the Netherlands and in accordance with Dutch law. Necessary intergovernmental agreements were concluded between the Netherlands and Ukraine, the Dutch Senate developed legislation that made it possible to try suspects in that country.

On March 9, 2020, the first hearing in the case of the downing of flight Mh27 took place.

In December 2021, Dutch prosecutors requested life sentences for three Russians and one Ukrainian citizen accused of involvement in the crash. According to the conclusions of the investigators, which were confirmed by the Dutch prosecutor's office, the plane was shot down by a self-propelled firing system of the Buk complex, which on the night of July 16-17 was transported from Russia to the territory of Ukraine, launched from an agricultural field near the settlement of Pervomaisky, at that time controlled by the DPR, and then on the night of July 17-18 was taken back to Russia.

According to the prosecution, all this happened with the direct participation of four defendants:

  • Igor Girkin (Strelkov), a Russian citizen, a former FSB colonel. In 2014, he was the Minister of Defense of the DPR, he left this post two months after the Mh27 crash;
  • Oleg Pulatov is a citizen of Russia. Pulatov was the deputy commander of the military intelligence of the DPR (known under the call sign Gyurza). According to the JIT, he previously served in the Russian GRU;
  • Sergei Dubinsky is also a Russian citizen. He was the head of intelligence of the DNR. The JIT also believes that he is a former GRU officer;
  • Leonid Kharchenko - citizen of Ukraine, militia. Investigators did not find a military past in him; during the events of 2014, he was subordinate to Dubinsky.

The Prosecution also considered that none of the defendants personally participated in the launch of a missile at the aircraft and that the airliner was not deliberately shot down.

Russia has repeatedly denied allegations of involvement in the plane crash. Moscow admitted that the plane was shot down by the Ukrainian military, and pointed to the refusal of the JIT to cooperate with the Russian side. In November 2020, a court in The Hague refused to consider alternative versions of the crash: according to one of them, the plane was shot down by a Ukrainian fighter, according to another, the Buk belonged to units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The judge decided that if the prosecutors did not prove guilt, the defendants would be automatically acquitted.

The Russian Ministry of Defense stated that the rocket that shot down the liner was produced at a plant in the Moscow region in 1986, after which it was delivered to Ukraine and was not exported to Russian territory. After the collapse of the USSR, the 223rd anti-aircraft missile brigade, to which the missile was delivered, became part of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that the process is "teeming" with double standards. According to him, they lie in the fact that even in safer conditions, the United States forbade its airlines to fly over areas where there are security risks, but flights over the Donbass, where “in July 2014 there was a real war,” were not prohibited. The head of the Foreign Ministry added that this is precisely the double standards that "swarm" not only this, but also other stories, "associated with the development of Western approaches to certain events in international life.


Learn more


Wave

North Coast Community Services
710 Fraser Street, Prince Rupert, BC V8J 1P9
Ph: 250.627.7166 | Fx: 250.627.7482

© All Rights Reserved | powered by ExpressionEngine