How many syllables in cat

What is a syllable? | TheSchoolRun

Syllables explained for parents, including details of how primary-school children are taught to identify syllables to help them with spelling and reading and understanding poetry.

or Register to add to your saved resources

What is a syllable?

A syllable is a single, unbroken sound of a spoken (or written) word. Syllables usually contain a vowel and accompanying consonants. Sometimes syllables are referred to as the ‘beats’ of spoken language.

Syllables differ from phonemes in that a phoneme is the smallest unit of sound; the number of syllables in a word is unrelated to the number of phonemes it contains. For example: /b/, /k/, /t/, /ch/, /sh/, /ee/, /ai/, /igh/, /ear/ are all phonemes. The word ‘chat’ is made up of three phonemes (/ch/ /a/ /t/). The word ‘light’ is made up of three phonemes (/l/ /igh/ /t/). However, both the words ‘chat’ and ‘light’ have only one syllable each.

The number of times you hear a vowel (a, e, i , o, u) in a word is equal to the number of syllables a word has. A good way to identify syllables is to think about whether you need to change your mouth shape to say the next bit of the word / the new syllable.

Give your child the gift of great grammar

Perfect Punctuation Workbook
Grammar Games Pack
PLUS 100s of other grammar resources

Download Now

Learning about syllables in primary school

Learning about syllables is part of learning how to decode and spell words. It helps children understand the conventions of English spelling, including when to double letters and how to pronounce the vowels in words they might not have seen before.

Teachers will often get children to clap out the syllables of a word, to help them to understand the concept. (A good game to introduce syllables is to ask each child to stand up and say their name, while clapping out the syllables. )

For example:

Cat has one syllable (words of one syllable are monosyllabic)
Water has two syllables (wa / ter)
Computer has three syllables (com / pu / ter)
Category has four syllables (cat / e / gor / y)

Syllables in KS1 English

Children in Key Stage 1 will be expected to read words of two syllables. They may be shown how to split the words up into syllables, in order to help them sound them out. For example: if they are shown the word ‘thunder’ and get stuck, a teach may cover the second half of the word (‘der’) and ask them to just sound out the first syllable. Once they have managed this, they uncover the rest of the word and ask them to sound this out.

Children in Key Stage 1 will also learn to spell words with two syllables, at which point they will be encouraged to separate the two syllables themselves, in order to learn the spelling of the whole word.

Syllables in KS2 English

During Key Stage 2, children will progress to learning the spellings of words containing four syllables (or possibly more). They also learn about the use of syllables in poetry.

Children may learn about syllables through writing haikus. A haiku is a Japanese poem with three lines, the first containing 5 syllables, the second containing 7 syllables and the third containing 5 syllables.

This is a haiku about a frog:

Wet amphibian,
Gulps, blinks and flicks out his tongue
To snatch a black fly.

Writing haikus encourages children to think about syllables, but also to think very carefully about their word choices – it may be that one word has too many syllables and does not fit, so they have to think of a new, similar word that fits the given criteria.

Another poetic form based on syllable number is the limerick (the first, second and fifth lines rhyme and have the same number of syllables, usually eight or nine).

How many syllables in cat?

How Many Syllables uses cookies to enhance your
experience.
By continuing to use this
site, you
are agreeing
to the use of cookies
as described in our Privacy Policy.

Syllables Rhymes

328675194 syllable

Divide cat into syllables: cat
Syllable stress: cat
How to pronounce cat: kat
How to say cat: cat syllables

Cite This Source

Wondering why cat is 328675194 syllable? Contact Us! We'll explain.

Syllable Rules

1. What is a syllable?
2. How to count syllables.
3. How to divide into syllables.

More Grammar

Trending Words

beautiful
elephant
people
teacher
family

the
every
water
different
apple

Plural Quiz

Is deer plural?

Take the Quiz

Syllables Rhymes

What rhymes with cat

1 syllable

at hear the syllables in at
batt hear the syllables in batt
brat hear the syllables in brat
cat hear the syllables in cat
chert hear the syllables in chert
drat hear the syllables in drat
flat hear the syllables in flat
gat hear the syllables in gat
gnat hear the syllables in gnat
hatt hear the syllables in hatt
lat hear the syllables in lat
matt hear the syllables in matt
matte hear the syllables in matte
pat hear the syllables in pat
phat hear the syllables in phat
plat hear the syllables in plat
Platte hear the syllables in platte
rat hear the syllables in rat
sat hear the syllables in sat
scatt hear the syllables in scatt
slat hear the syllables in slat
splat hear the syllables in splat
stat hear the syllables in stat
that hear the syllables in that
vat hear the syllables in vat

bat hear the syllables in bat
blat hear the syllables in blat
Cat hear the syllables in cat
chat hear the syllables in chat
dat hear the syllables in dat
fat hear the syllables in fat
frat hear the syllables in frat
Gatt hear the syllables in gatt
hat hear the syllables in hat
kat hear the syllables in kat
mat hear the syllables in mat
Matt hear the syllables in matt
Nat hear the syllables in nat
patt hear the syllables in patt
plait hear the syllables in plait
platt hear the syllables in platt
Pratt hear the syllables in pratt
rat's hear the syllables in rat's
scat hear the syllables in scat
skat hear the syllables in skat
spat hear the syllables in spat
sprat hear the syllables in sprat
tat hear the syllables in tat
va hear the syllables in va

2 syllables

begat hear the syllables in begat
cravat hear the syllables in cravat
labatt hear the syllables in labatt
nonfat hear the syllables in nonfat

combat hear the syllables in combat
gata hear the syllables in gata
landsat hear the syllables in landsat
Sadat hear the syllables in sadat

3 syllables

Gujarat hear the syllables in gujarat

Teachers

How can $250 help your students?

One prize is awarded to
one teacher, every month.

$Read the contest rules and apply

Fun Fact

“Orange” became the term for
a fruit in the 13th century.

!Get more facts

FAQ

Does tongue have
1 or 2 syllables?

?Learn Here

Ever Wonder

when to use
Its and It's?

Learn Here

Parents, Teachers, StudentsDo you have a grammar question?
Need help finding a syllable count?
Want to say thank you?

Words "cats" morphological and phonetic analysis

Explanation of the rules for dividing (breaking down) the word "cats" into syllables for transfer.
Soosle.ru online dictionary will help: parse the word “ cats ” phonetically and morphologically by composition, correctly divide into syllables according to the rules of the Russian language, highlight parts of the word, put stress, indicate the meaning, synonyms, antonyms and compatibility for the word “ cats ".

Cat word by syllables

Contents:

1 Syllables in the word "cats" division into syllables
2 How to transfer the word "cats"
3 Morphological analysis of the word "cats"
4 Analysis of the word "cats" by composition
6 Synonyms of the word "cats"
7 Stress in the word "cats"
8 Phonetic transcription of the word "cats"
9 Phonetic analysis of the word "cats" into letters and sounds (Sound-letter)
10 Sentences with the word "cats"
11 Associations with the word "cats"
12 Meaning of the word "cats" "cats" division into syllables
Number of syllables: 2
By syllables: cats

According to the rules of the school curriculum, the word "cats" can be divided into syllables in different ways. Variability is allowed, that is, all options are correct. For example, like this:
kosh-ki

According to the program of the institute, syllables are distinguished on the basis of ascending sonority:
ko-shki

The types of syllables are listed below and the division is explained taking into account the program of the institute and schools with in-depth study of the Russian language.
ko - initial, covered, open, 2 letters
shki - final, covered, open, 3 letters0017

How to transfer the word “cats”

koshchi
kosh - kosh - kosh - kosh

Morphological analysis of the word “cat”

Part Speech:

Noun

Grammar:

Part of speech: noun noun ;
animation: inanimate;
gender: female;
number: singular, plural;
case: genitive, nominative, accusative;
answers the question: (no/near) What?, (is) What?, (I see/blame) What?

Initial form:

cat

Analysis of the word "cats" by composition

kosh root

to suffix

a ending

cat

Words similar in morphemic structure “cats”

Words similar in morphemic structure
dog
monkey
sheep
mouse
lizard

Synonyms of the word "cats"0008

3. Dereza

4. Deryka

5. sticky grass

6. Small

7. Smolly grass

8. Pilika

9. Tricky

10. Dogs

Stress in the word "cats"

cats - the stress falls on the 1st syllable

Phonetic transcription of the word "cats"

[k'oshk'i]

Phonetic analysis of the word "cats" into letters and sounds (Sound-letter )

Letter	Sound	Sound characteristics	Color
to	[k]	consonant, deaf double, hard, noisy	to
about	[`o]	vowel, stressed	about
w	[w]	consonant, deaf double, hard, hissing, noisy	sh
to	[k']	consonant, deaf double, soft, noisy	to
and	[and]	vowel, unstressed	and

Number of letters and sounds:
Based on the analysis made, we conclude that the word has 5 letters and 5 sounds.
Letters: 2 vowels, 3 consonants.
Sounds: 2 vowels, 3 consonants.

Sentences with the word "cats"

But then, probably some black cat ran between them and the relationship was broken.

Alexander Arsaniev, Secrets of Countess A.'s archive.

I must have looked like a black wild cat before the jump.

Marina Serova, Poison web.

More fighting, less fighting - what difference does it make when cats scratch their hearts in memory of one of their representatives.

Nikolai Stepanov, Masters of the fifth sign, 2004.

Conjugation of the word “cats”

1. black cat

2. wild cat

3. big cat

4. cat mouse

5. with a cat in her arms

8. The grace of the cat

9. With the dexterity of the cat

10. Cats screech

11. The cat ran

12. The cat meowed

13. Love cats

14. Strengthen the cat

15. See cat

16. (complete compatibility table)

The meaning of the word "cats"

CAT1, -i, genus. pl. - shek, dat. -shkam, well. 1. A pet with the habits of a predator, exterminating mice and rats; female cat.

CAT2 , -i, gen. pl. - shek, dat. -shkam, well. Region Sandy or small stone shoal. (Small Academic Dictionary, MAC)

How to spell the word "cats"

Spelling of the word "cats"
Spelling of the word "cats"

The word is spelled correctly:

Numbering of letters in the word
Numbers of letters in the word "cats" in forward and reverse order:

Associations to the word "cats"

Kitten
Mice
Cats
Mouse
Mouse
Dog
Sour cream
Muzzle
Kotov
Allergy
Panther
Mink
Grace
Leopard
Darling
Rat
Mouse
Foot
Animals
Claw
Wool
Veterinarian
Cream
Homemade
Paw
Masha
Fox
Musical
Agility
Sparrow
Red
Cat
Tail
Tiger
Skin
Mammal
Lynx
Cream
Kura
Scruff
Dog
Pupil
Agility
Animal

Tattered
Dead
Brindle
Homeless
Stray
Mangy
Feline
March
Neighborhood
Wild
Spotted
Mouse
Striped
Smoked
Thoroughbred
Graceful
Fluffy
Rabbit
Predatory
Flexible
Home

Scrape
purr
Bend
Stretch
hiss
Hiss
Run across
Sneak
Claw
sneak
Grumble
wash
Curl
Creep
Golubet
Arch
Soak up
Warm up
Iron
Landing
Run across
Annoy
Jump
Biting
Snort
Feed
Smell
Rip off
caress
Scratch
Climb
Jump in

Gracefully
Sneak
Kalachik

Published: 2020-09-15

Popular words

pupil , conversations who ran up ruffled , scrape calculated , which etched , Vyacheslav , hemolysis , gennadievichi , tunic , housekeeping , vibrate , screwed , peacock , parabellums parked , enumerated , poster , submitting , fly up , undergrowth , the most positive , pom-poms , hunted , Prague , absenteeism , clear your throat prostituting , gas masks , deployed , section , untwisted , bite through , I will terminate , reserved , reorganized , responsor , sylvaner , salt

Tell me (syllables)

My son goes to school to prepare. We began to break words into syllables. While simple. But I thought about how to break the words "cat, form." The question is for mothers of schoolchildren. Because I found one version on the Internet, and another in the book. Plz tell me.

Cat, shape.

thanks

It can't be. A syllable is a phonetic unit, do not confuse it with the rules for dividing a word when transferring.
In all sources, the division into syllables is carried out according to the same rules - ascending to sonority.

The syllable must end in either a vowel or a sonorant consonant. Ko-shka, form-ma.

there is no syllable shka, kosh-ka and nothing else

Only not in elementary school And they don't explain the rules for increasing sonority, you can be sure
And the norm of dividing into syllables is to break up consonant clusters. Without explanation, at the conceptual level. Therefore, cat-ka, form-ma.

What makes you think that it is not?

Bad schools don't explain anything else.
"And the norm of dividing into syllables is to break up consonant clusters" Indicate the source of such nonsense. Or is it your own composition?

Do not pour on schools. It does not depend on their goodness. It would be nonsense to explain to children in the 1st grade the principle of ascending sonority
This is not my own composition. And you, as I see it, are very far from school education, aren't you?
If you're really interested, dig into ANY elementary school literacy and Russian language programs. You will be surprised a lot0008

That's the answer I expected. You have no idea about the topic, but there you climb to discuss
I'm very familiar with programs, in contrast. And I will tell you that in the 1st grade they do not teach to divide into syllables at all, FOR THERE IS NO NEED.
And there is nothing super-complicated that even a first-grader could not master in dividing into syllables. This is more difficult with transfer rules.

Learn. It's in the first class. IBO is required by the program.

Where did you get what you have?? Specify the source.

What kind of nonsense you write. In my opinion, you are completely far from the learning process in a modern school.

Here is what Rosenthal wrote:
"The syllable, as the main sound unit of the Russian language, obeys the law of ascending sonority: within a syllable, sounds are arranged from the least sonorous to the most sonorous. decreasing sonority, sonorous consonants follow, and finally noisy consonants.0003 1. the combination of noisy consonants between vowels goes to the next syllable: simple
2. the combination of a noisy consonant with a sonorant consonant between vowels goes to the next syllable: do-bro
3. the combination of a sonorous consonant with a noisy consonant between vowels has a syllable division inside this combination: par-ta
4. the combination of sound [j] with noisy or sonorous between vowels has a syllable division within this combination, since [j] is more sonorous than sonorous: tay-na
5. the combination of sonorous consonants between vowels goes to the next syllable : co-rma

The syllable division is associated with the morphological articulation of the word: it depends on the junction of morphemes and the nature of this junction, i.e. whether there is a syllabary division at the junction of a prefix and a root, a root and a suffix."

And one more quote from I.E Savko's textbook "The entire school course of the Russian language":
"In the Russian literary language, the division into syllables is based on the principle of ascending sonority. This means that the sounds in a syllable (unfinished) are arranged from the least sonorous to the most sonorous. If the sonority is conventionally denoted by numbers, the following will be obtained: 3 - vowel sound, 2 - sonorous consonant sound, 1 - other (noisy) consonant sounds. The division into syllables will be carried out according to the principle of ascending sonority: book (1 2 3 - 1 3), i-on-che (3 - 2 3 - 1 3), in-lo (1 3 - 2 3 - 1 2 3).
Difficulties in dividing a word into syllables may arise when consonants collide. At the same time, in the Russian literary language, based on Moscow pronunciation, the division into syllables will be carried out taking into account the following:
1. If two noisy or two sonorous sounds (except [j]) are next to each other on the border of syllables, they refer to the subsequent vowel: pu -shka, i-zba, in-lna.
2. If the first [j] in a consonant combination, it always goes to the previous vowel: war-na, may-ka.
3. In a combination of consonants, the first of which is sonorant, and the second is noisy, sonorant can go to the previous vowel: con-spect, Vol-ga.
The division of words into syllables does not always coincide with the division of words for transfer. "

Based on these rules, the following division into syllables is obtained: cat, form.

no, form, similar to rule no. 3 about class
3. the combination of a sonorous consonant with a noisy consonant between vowels has a syllable division inside this combination: class

But it seems to me that this refers to this:
"5. the combination of sonorous consonants between vowels goes to the next syllable: ko-rma"
"r" and "m" are two sonorous sounds, not sonorous and noisy.
or to this (second quote):
"1. If two noisy or two sonorous sounds (except [j]) are nearby on the border of syllables, they refer to the subsequent vowel: pu-shka, i-zba, v-lna. "

Both words fall under this rule because in the word "cat" - a combination of two noisy consonants between vowels, and in the word "form" - two sonorants. Therefore: cat, form.

And I didn't say that division into syllables is super difficult for first-graders. simplifying as much as possible. They teach them this for a long time, as you already wrote. And, of course, no principles of ascending sonority are taken into account.
I wonder how familiar you are with programs. Yes, still great. So far, they have shown complete ignorance.

Can the question be off topic? Why are children taught such a syllable division, and then, for transfer, another one? What's the point?

For younger students, the Rosenthal rules. Let's try to start from the examples you've given. It is advisable to teach division into syllables, not because "it would be nice to know", but taking into account the rules of transfer and morphemic analysis. From this point of view, it is logical to separate IZ-BA, KOSH-KA, PUSH-KA.
And in general, what is the semantic load of division into syllables? Teaching literate reading and learning to transfer correctly. Both of these things happen in elementary school. When for children the rules of syllable division described by Rosenthal are completely indigestible. Neither from the point of view of assimilation, nor from the point of view of application in practice.

Let's not mix. In this topic, 2 points of view have already collided: the "correct" division into syllables and the "convenient". In practice, in elementary school, it is precisely the "convenient" division into syllables that is used. In further education, if in-depth philological knowledge is not required, the rules of syllable division are practically not applied.

I tried to figure out what was right from the point of view of the modern literary Russian language. Only and everything.

This is understandable. I did not want to confuse the author with this information. Its task is simpler - to divide it the way the teacher wants.
From the point of view of philological rules - yes, you are right

Give a link to this program. In the first grade, they are taught to write, and not to divide into syllables.

Well, yes, let's change all the phonetics to what you personally think is digestible And let's summarize the spelling rules according to how it is convenient for someone to write For example, 99% of Eve make a mistake conjugating the verb "write" according to the 2nd conjugation, so let's put it into exception words on this basis.
They divide into syllables because they teach the phonetic analysis of the word. This is just an element of phonetic parsing. "Morphemic analysis" has absolutely nothing to do with it.

They take it into account. In order to correctly divide into syllables, you need to master the skill of determining voiced-deafness and distinguishing between vowels and consonants. The same goals as set by phonetic analysis. There is no inconsistency here.
It was you who showed complete ignorance. They hammered into their heads some dubious method that is nowhere to be confirmed. And so they are "sure" in this that even signing under one's own words is weak, anonymous is fucking

We have "Planet of Knowledge", 1st grade, they taught us to divide words into syllables. My mother works at the "School of Russia", they also divide. I don't think it's anywhere else.

My dear, it's not me who here asserts with aplomb that "the cat and nothing else"

We have "School 2100" - they don't share.
Here is a lesson on your program - they take primitive words like "milk" and stupidly count the number of syllables.
http://festival.1september.ru/articles/559352/
This is not teaching, but propaedeutics.

Milk - really, stupid. Ours shared other words, and not just those prescribed on the website of the "Festival". No one got worse from this. I don't know. why they don’t divide with you, but the son of a friend studies at 2100 and divided words into syllables.

In-depth philological knowledge also requires an analysis of the syllable (open, covered, closed), this is not studied in school grammar. And to divide into syllables correctly or not to divide depends only on the qualifications of the teacher, and not even on the program

Why teach phonetic parsing of a word at all?

It would be better if they taught how to write properly, by God, they will have time to endow themselves with syllables in 11 years. Otherwise, I explained all the subtleties of writing (where to start the letter, where to tear off the pen, graphic mode) to my son myself, and the task of the school is to rewrite the text from the copybook .

Thank God, the intricacies of writing were explained at school quite well, otherwise I would have gone crazy with these subtleties

I'll skip the rudeness for now. I understand that you have a hard time controlling yourself. Happens
What I am writing about, I repeat, was not invented by me. For younger students, adapted syllable division is allowed. The immediate goal is to teach the correct transfer. Why else do students need to divide into syllables? In general, in a school without a philological bias, the principle of division according to ascending sonority is not spoken out. No need.
And subject to the principle of resonant sound. insufficient knowledge of voiced-deafness and vowels-consonants. We are talking about 6-7 year olds. What sonority? What are you talking about?
But the transfer of learning is in the immediate future.
If you really want to understand the topic - take any primer. See where the syllabic reading begins. I think you will be very surprised how they could, without listening to Rosenthal, dare to single out syllables as it is convenient for children

First-graders are taught according to several programs. Open Zelenina's textbook, for example. The section "Sounds and letters", lessons 16,17 and 18 are devoted to dividing words into syllables. Apparently, you have a very remote idea about education in elementary school. Why then aggressive categorical?

In general, many parents themselves confuse the division into syllables and hyphenation rules. In the first grade, they are taught precisely to determine the number of syllables by the number of vowels. Elementary drawing a line after each vowel, the child will answer the question - How many syllables are there in a word? It's enough.

What an emotional intensity.

Why transfer is more relevant than division into syllables, don't be ridiculous. You generally read the words of the interlocutor, I'm not going to explain the same thing to the dumb in the tenth circle. I don’t need to understand, I’m just in the subject

Exactly. It depends on which word to choose for analysis, and this is the professionalism of both the teacher and the author of the textbook. Therefore, it is impossible to look at some textbooks without tears. And if the word "showcase" is taken, and not "cow", then separating it as "vit-ri-na" is a gross mistake and incompetence.

I don't have to sew my sick fantasies

I repeat the question: what is the purpose of teaching a child this or that mechanism of dividing a word into syllables? If the task is practical - transfer - I understand. If the task is theoretically abstruse, such a kind of exercise in ascending sonority - then why is this necessary? Honestly, I don’t remember such a task either at school or at the university. True, I am not a Slavist - I have a Romano-Germanic philology. But still...

I just spoke out in this top against the tendency to deliberately wrong learning, which is contrary to scientific grammar. And you have already switched to personalities twice, so look for logs in your eyes, OK?

Transfer is no more "practical" task than division into syllables. It has nothing to do with spelling.

YOU are wrong. You torn off the consonant from the root KOSH, you can't do that. Here is the syllable KOSH

"And I'll tell you that in the 1st grade they don't teach to divide into syllables at all, FOR THERE IS NO NEED."
By linking to a specific first grade textbook, I seem to have personally offended you. I don't want to disappoint you, but I don't have any personal feelings for you. I sincerely wish you more positive emotions in real life.

You have a rather peculiar vocabulary for a person who fights with such passion for the purity of the Russian language. I'm not fit to be your virtual enemy, because you will not be able to cause retaliatory aggression on my part. Hope everything works out for you.

I "fight" not for the "purity of the Russian language", but for the conformity of scientific theory and practical skills that are instilled in children in elementary school. Look into the dictionary more often, then you will learn to call things by their proper names.

Eleven approved elementary school programs. Even if you are given links to lesson plans for all the textbooks used, you will remain unconvinced. Why waste time? In the first grade, the division of words into syllables is studied. A link to one textbook is enough to refute your erroneous assertion. These are the laws of logic. What exactly are you arguing about? We leave personal attacks on your conscience.

I repeat, you didn't give a single REFERENCE. I found the link to that lesson plan myself, and I’m not going to sit in Yandex all day to find 10 more links. Moreover, it was YOU who started arguing with me, since you don’t know how to argue reasonably, which you proved, there’s nothing to be offended

You are confused in terms. I understand your pain, but it is worth focusing on the topic of discussion. For me personally, the division of words into syllables not for transfer in elementary school does not seem to be a relevant topic, it is possible that we are the same in this. The practice of teaching in elementary school is very far from scientific theory in the field of philology, this is a fact. Just a given, not good or bad. Worse, the general level of teacher training is such that discussing their lack of theoretical knowledge in the field of philology is out of the realm of discussing the lack of knowledge of plumbing in the field of fluid turbulence.

Do they continue NOT to study division into syllables in the first grade? To be honest, I did not take into account your difficulties in communicating with search engines. Not all forums allow you to provide links, so most virtual interlocutors never think of accusing opponents of such "sins". You're letting off steam here, so this attack is also forgiven.

Wrong word hyphenation is a spelling error. Phonetic analysis is not used in written speech, the division of words into syllables for transfer is used.

I am the author. Thanks to everyone for not disregarding my question, this is exactly what I wanted to hear, that according to the rules described in Rosenthal's textbook, one thing, and another in elementary school. I figured it out from the textbook, but I also realized that for a 7 year old it’s strong, but I could explain it to my son, but it’s good that I didn’t, it’s important to know how they teach at school!

I'm not confused about anything. Don't look for problems where there are none. Learning to correctly divide into syllables does not mean delving into "scientific theory in the field of philology."
We designate vowels, sonorants, deaf and voiced by the corresponding numbers and build a syllable.
1-voiced
2-voiced
3-sonorous
4-vowels
The same example with the word "cat".
14-114
CO-SHKA
I admit that some topics are not covered at all in school grammar. But to give them in such a way that they CONTRACT theory is not permissible for a professional.

Any lesson has a methodological goal. So, the goal of lessons in grade 1 on the topic "syllables" is to teach how to determine the number of syllables in a word, no more. How many vowels in a word, so many syllables And words for examples are selected appropriate, light.

Not. If the word is spelled correctly, but it is not hyphenated, this is just a violation of the graphic mode, such as a missing period or a small letter at the beginning of a sentence. The rating is not reduced for this.

If you really TEACH this at school, then for a child the division of words into syllables should not be so difficult that you need to involve your mother in this.

There is a small problem, there is no definition of "easy" word. This is probably why both teachers and parents make mistakes. Personally, I definitely do not understand why it is necessary to divide words into syllables at all, if this is not a division for transfer. Can there be any real application of this skill in teaching literacy?

Depends on the teacher's beliefs. Often the score for "violation of the graphics mode" is reduced by half a point. Many elementary school teachers also lower grades for corrections made by the student on their own, i.e. for a correct but sloppy letter. I'm not sure there are clear rules for this. Sometimes in the manuals for specific manuals, including test papers, there are recommendations for assessment.

i.e. Do you think that a literate person can be considered a correct writer if he transfers words incorrectly? We're not talking about what the teacher thinks aunt manya from zazhopinsk thinks, but about teaching a child to write correctly? And dots-capital letters are also not needed?

you are strange, why don’t I play with my child and share other words, even if it’s in a traffic jam or while I’m cooking. .we not only play this, but also come up with tasks and much more

again overlaid the unfamiliar school and teacher. Well done!

There are rules. The rating is actually reduced by half a point. But, apparently, for snorks, the transfer rules are not rules at all and have nothing to do with literate writing.

It doesn't sound like you really want to understand the topic. If your goal is to rush headlong to the barricades, then you can understand such emotional speeches in defense of science.
Mom - the author of the topic had another goal: to find out how words are divided into syllables in preparation. If it were important for you, then you would not be too lazy to respond to my proposal and look at the photos of the pages of any primer. With the Internet, this is not difficult. Then you would see how literate children are encouraged to do this. I hope it's not a secret for you that in the vast majority of primers, learning is syllabic?

I say this without aplomb, but with knowledge of the subject.

You do not know the subject.

You're the weird one, asking stupid questions on the forum for the sake of pirgazzo.
Do you have other toys available? Bednaya))

+100 Cat, shape.

blue sky * wrote: >>
Is there any real application of this skill in teaching literacy?
Not allowed.

Now there are new rules, according to which both options are correct - Kosh-ka and Ko-shka. It is better to teach the child the first option, because when they learn to isolate the root, it will be easier for children. This is how the teacher explained it.

And who teaches good writing? Rosenthal? Or Aunt Manya?
Aunt Manya, teaching writing, and not reading Rosenthal, is a terrible picture.
Aunt Manya, who doesn't put triples for incorrect transfer - better, isn't it?
And Aunt Manya, who puts fives for "you write that ..." HOW?

Both options are considered correct, both in elementary school and in general)))

No. None.

Not counted.

Who are not considered? These are the accepted rules of the Russian language, only yesterday our teacher explained this point.

The primer has nothing to do with scientific division into syllables.

At least Rosenthal doesn't think so. Read the post above.

Well, let him not count. These are accepted rules, and I'm not going to argue with anyone.

Nah, cat, form (however, I have a little doubt about the form), at the birth meeting they explained something to us about sonority in this way. Children don't seem to be told about sonority, but they are taught to divide in this way. In our program, at least.

But we don't know what the teacher wants! Our teacher wanted a cat, exactly from these rules, which he briefly explained to parents and asked not to confuse more children.

-200

Accepted by whom? Your teacher?

Well, put up with the fact that children are taught "incorrectly", and this is a massive phenomenon.
If you dig deeper, you will be surprised at how incorrectly children in elementary school do phonetic analysis, how far it is from scientific. And the morphological is far from perfect, the children do not single out the root from one letter, and they do not lower their grade for this.

What is your program? Who is the author of the textbook? Are you sure that this is according to the program, and not "according to the teacher"?

Yes, because our teacher is involved in the development and testing of this program. "Promising Primary School".

I am very far from the theory of linguistics. I can't even boast of unconditional literacy. I don’t undertake to correctly divide any word into syllables, I don’t need this skill yet, I need to learn a lot of other things myself and teach the child. I do not understand your belief that Rosenthal is forever. Doesn't the language change? Even in the eyes of an amateur, changes are inevitable and they happen every day, new norms are fixed over time. It is likely that the division into syllables is now undergoing this kind of evolution.

Yes, let Aunt Manya reduce marks for both incorrect hyphenation and grammatical errors. Why don't you leave her a choice? Do you have a primary school child and an illiterate teacher?

I would smash it like they say: cat, thief. but... our first grade teacher says there are two ways to divide. that is, a cat will also not be a mistake.

and played with you ... that's how much you wrote

we are already learning in preparation.

Oh, you haven't even gotten to the point of parsing the word by composition...

I was not too lazy, I got into the ABC, which my first grade had (ed. Academbook, admitted ... etc.) -rny, ma-rme-lad, y-mlyon. True, we do not have dashes, but leagues below, so unobtrusively the syllables are highlighted. Yes, we were taught otherwise.

Well, look: http://www.labirint.ru/screenshot/goods/134065/2/#7
Starting from the fifth page of Zhukova's primer so beloved by many.
And so in the vast majority of primers. And believe me, I have studied the issue.

not, well, maybe there is a "shka" in Zaitsev's cubes, but there is no such syllable.

Well, then Zhukov is a reprint from old editions, such as we were taught. Well, I didn’t come up with our analysis myself - we have it in the textbook, which, by the way, is approved as a textbook, etc. (does Zhukova have admissions, by the way?). I just didn’t study the question - mine have been playing music since the age of 2, the first years they just slammed the words (so that there was a musical rhythm) and, naturally, they got ro-ma-shka, and not ro-mashka, respectively, analysis , offered by him at school, they did not cause protest and doubts that it could be otherwise. Well, at the meeting, I remember the teacher stamping her feet on the topic that stop confusing children, if you don’t know - don’t teach, we will teach ourselves, but if you want to help, read the textbook (naturally, according to which children learn, and not everything in the world). http://www.labirint.ru/screenshot/goods/201546/1/

It turns out to be interesting... But what has my first-grader been doing all this time?! I thought that by dividing words into syllables...

I didn't get it. The child seems to have reached, but without me. Our teacher has been teaching Russian in high school for over 20 years. They divide into syllables only for transfer. The composition of the word pass already. The teacher is sure that the root-prefix-suffix-ending is what helps the child learn to write correctly. At home, we work out practical skills, we leave the theory to the discretion of the teacher. The child copes very well with all sorts of parsing, but chu-shu, cha-scha, a dividing soft sign can still write incorrectly. The child is 7 years old.

Juggling between things. With a child, I hope you do not indulge in this. This is not as support for an opponent who is rude to you.

blue sky * wrote (a): >> ending is what helps the child (what to do?) Learn to write correctly.
Learn. Get at least that for a start.
Many rules are based on word formation and morphology, your teacher is right. But on phonetics in this regard - spit

Not. There is no shoemaker without boots My in 1st grade

Rosenthal did not invent anything, but merely systematized what existed. PR is such that its syllabic system is a feature of pronunciation. So, it is unlikely that it will change in the near future.

- 1000000 Cat, shape.

So in the Harmony and School 2100 programs (I don't know about others).

What does the root have to do with it??? A simple example: forest, le-sa; house, do-ma. Everywhere the letter was torn off from the root
And the cat is correct.